Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/epih/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2025-07.txt): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 95 Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 96 Decomposing Gender Disparity in Total Physical Activity among Iranian Adults
Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Epidemiol Health : Epidemiology and Health

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search
Advanced Search
mobile menu button

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Epidemiol Health > Volume 39; 2017 > Article
Original Article
 Decomposing Gender Disparity in Total Physical Activity among Iranian Adults
Ebrahim Rahimi1orcid, Seyed Saeed Hashemi-Nazari1,2orcid, Koorosh Etemad1orcid, Hamid Soori1,2orcid
Epidemiol Health 2017;39:e2017044.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2017044
Published online: October 16, 2017

1Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention Research Center, School of Public Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Correspondence: Hamid Soori  Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention Reseach Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Parvaneh St., Velenjak Area, Chamran Highway, Tehran 1985717444, Iran  E-mail: hsoori@yahoo.com
• Received: August 12, 2017   • Accepted: October 16, 2017

©2017, Korean Society of Epidemiology

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

prev next
  • 17,152 Views
  • 202 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
  • 7 Scopus
Full Article

Download PDF Download PDF

  • OBJECTIVES
    While gender differences in physical activity (PA) have been reported, their origin is not well understood. The present study aimed to identify factors contributing to this disparity.
  • METHODS
    This was a population-based cross-sectional study based on the 2011 surveillance of risk factors of non-communicable diseases that was conducted among Iranian adults. Multi-staged sampling was performed to obtain the required study sample. The primary outcome was gender differences in the prevalence of sufficient physical activity (SPA). Total physical activity (TPA) was calculated as metabolic equivalents (MET) per minute during a typical week, as recommended by the World Health Organization. On this basis, achieving 600 MET-min/wk or more was defined as SPA. The nonlinear Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition technique was used to explain the disparity.
  • RESULTS
    The predicted gap was 19.50%. About one-third of the gap was due to differences in the level of observable covariates. Among them, work status contributed the most (29.61%). A substantial portion of the gap remained unexplained by such differences, of which about 40.41% was related to unobservable variables. The differential effects of standard of living, ethnicity, and smoking status made the largest contribution, accounting for 37.36, 35.47, and 28.50%, respectively.
  • CONCLUSIONS
    Interventions to reduce the gender gap in PA should focus on increasing TPA among housewives and women with chronic diseases, as well as those with a higher standard of living. In addition, it is essential to explore the impact of ethnicity and smoking status on women’s TPA in order to promote health.
  • Keywords: Gender identity, Exercise, Physical exertion, Socioeconomic factors
Physical activity (PA) is a major contributor to the prevention of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It is also associated with other health conditions throughout the world, including obesity, mental health, and mortality. It has been shown that people who are PA have lower mortality rates than those who are inactive [1-3].
The health benefits of increasing the level of PA can be obtained in various ways and do not always include exercise. The largest limitation in some relevant studies is that PA at work, during transportation, and during leisure time has not been considered [3]. To gain a better understanding of PA patterns, assessing individuals’ total physical activity (TPA) in all domains is necessary.
As suggested by the World Health Organization (WHO), adults should perform PA for at least 75 minutes at a vigorous intensity, 150 minutes at a moderate intensity, or an equivalent combination of moderate and vigorous-intensity activity, achieving at least 600 metabolic equivalents (METs) per minute in a typical week. Despite this, few adults regularly participate in PA to promote health; fewer than one-third of adults (over 18 years old) meet the WHO’s recommended levels of PA [4].
To promote PA, it is necessary to obtain information on its prevalence and determinants in the population. Many factors are associated with PA, including age, health status, and the social-physical environment, especially aspects of the environment outside the health system, such as public transportation [5].
In addition, it is also necessary to identify subgroups of the population with low levels of PA for further interventions and preventive measures. Studies conducted in many countries have shown a gender difference in PA. They have often reported less PA among women than among men [4,6-8]. In Iran, some reports using data from the national surveillance of risk factors for NCDs (SuRFNCD) likewise indicated that Iranian adults, particularly women, had low levels of PA as well [6,9]. Based on the 2011 SuRFNCD, Koohpayehzadeh et al. [6] stated that about 28.7% of men and 49.7% of women were classified as having low levels of PA. Since sedentary people are more likely than active people to develop NCDs, this may translate to an increased risk among women. Nevertheless, few studies have assessed the factors that contribute to gender differences in PA.
While gender differences in on the level of contributors might cause disparities in PA, it is also possible that these factors have a differential association with PA in men and women. For example, the effects of equivalent education on PA may differ by gender due to sociocultural factors. Therefore, it is important to clarify whether gender disparities in PA are explained by differences in the level of contributors or the differential effects of the contributing factors between men and women.
However, little is known about the factors contributing to gender disparities in TPA among adults in Iran. Such information is necessary for formulating policies to address this gap.
The aims of the present study were to identify factors associated with a higher level of TPA in men and to estimate how much of the gender difference in PA can be attributed to each of these factors. Therefore, we examined men-women disparities in TPA prevalence in Iranian adults using an extension of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition method [10-13] to determine the factors contributing to the gap. To our knowledge, this is the first study to provide detailed information on this subject using this method. It may have policy implications, especially concerning modifiable factors [14].
The Blinder-Oaxaca method, an approach for decomposing inequality used in economics [11,12], has proven useful for understanding the underlying causes of disparities in health outcomes [14-23]. The original method used a counterfactual regression approach decomposing the difference in a mean outcome of interest between 2 groups into a part that is explained by group differences in levels of observable characteristics and a part attributable to the differential effect of these characteristics between 2 groups and the effect of the other unknown factors that were not included in the model. Thus, the method quantifies the contributions from different parts [10-12].
The study data were obtained from the SuRFNCD-2011 of Iranian adults. This was a population-based cross-sectional study based on the WHO’s STEPwise approach to NCD risk factor surveillance (STEPS) [24,25]. The survey used a multi-stage sampling method to obtain the required study sample. Details of the survey can be found elsewhere [6,26].
The primary outcome was a difference in the prevalence of sufficient physical activity (SPA) between men and women. TPA was calculated as METs per minute during a typical week using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire as suggested by the WHO. On this basis, achieving 600 MET-min/wk or more was defined as SPA. The questionnaire collected information on PA in 3 domains, including PA at work, during transportation (walking and/or cycling), and during leisure time, and covered various components of PA, such as frequency, duration, and intensity [27,28].
A set of covariates that could potentially affect PA behavior was categorized into predisposing, enabling, and need-related factors based on Andersen’s socio-behavioral model [29].
Age (years), family size, educational status (less than high school, a high school diploma, or at least some college), work status, and ethnicity (Fars or other) were considered predisposing factors [30, 31]. Work status was defined based on the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Subjects who had no job and were not looking for work were counted as not in the labor force. This category included housewives, students, and those unable to work [32].
The covariates categorized as enabling factors were standard of living, geographical region (province of current residence), and rural/urban residence [30,31]. Results for the sets of covariates, including living area (m2) and the presence of some housing amenities, such as a vacuum cleaner, personal computer, separate freezer, washing machine, and sole use of the bathrooms and kitchen, were considered part of a household’s standard of living. To distinguish between rural and urban residences, every geographical area with a municipality was considered a city (urban area) according to the Statistical Center of Iran.
The covariates identified as need-related factors were the subjects’ history of chronic conditions (including cardio/cerebrovascular disease, osteoporosis, asthma, colon cancer, and type 2 diabetes), high blood pressure (> 140/90 mmHg), smoking status, and overweight/obese (body mass index of 25.0 kg/m2 or higher) [30].
Gender differences in covariates were examined using the chisquare test and the Student t-test. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed with MET-minutes as the dependent variable for all subjects. An extension of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition for nonlinear models was conducted to explain gender disparities in proportion to SPA. Because the decomposition estimates are sensitive to the choice of a reference group [10,33], in our case, the men group with the higher prevalence of SPA was preferred as the reference. Accordingly, the regression coefficients from the equation for men were used as the reference coefficients.
The application of the original (linear) method to nonlinear decomposition models had also other conceptual problems that affected the results. One of them is known as the identification problem, in essence, the decomposition estimates for categorical variables also depended on the selection of the baseline (omitted) category [10,34]. We handled this issue by computing the decomposition based on “normalized” effects, as proposed by Yun [35]. This method was equivalent to averaging the coefficient effects of a set of dummy variables representing a categorical variable while changing the baseline groups [34].
Another issue was path dependency, in which the contribution of each covariate to the gap depends on the values of the other covariates and also the order in which those enter the decomposition [36]. We employed a convenient solution to this problem, using weights as suggested by Yun [13], so that any ordering of the way that variables enter the decomposition produced the same results due to the weights. The decomposition approach used here is described in detail in the Appendix 1.
All analyses were performed using Stata version 12 (StataCorp., College Station, TX, USA). The decomposition analysis was implemented using an updated Oaxaca package proposed by Yun [13] that supported nonlinear decomposition for binary dependent variables. The package included methods to handle the path dependency and identification problems.
Table 1 provides descriptive statistics for all the subjects. It also presents a comparison of the level of covariates between gender groups. There were 10,356 adults included in the analyses, of whom 4,289 (41.41%) were men. Approximately 58.10% achieved the WHO’s recommendation for PA (600 MET-minutes or more). About half of the women met the recommendation, whereas about 70.98% of men did so, which was significantly higher than that for women (p< 0.001). Statistically significant gender differences were also found in the levels of all covariates, except for ethnicity (p= 0.43) and having a bathroom (p= 0.31).
Table 2 shows the adjusted association of each covariate with the level of PA for men and women separately.
In women, the household’s standard of living, educational status, the presence of hypertension, and history of chronic disease were significantly associated with PA (p< 0.05), and only educational status had positive associations.
Among men, only age, work status, and history of chronic disease had statistically significant relationships with the prevalence of PA, and all were inversely associated.
Furthermore, some covariates such as smoking status were associated with PA differently in each gender. Current smoking was positively associated with PA in women, whereas in men the association was inverse. However, both relationships were statistically insignificant.
Table 3 presents the decomposition results for gender differentials in the level of PA. As shown, differences in the level of observed covariates accounted for about one-third of the overall gap (the explained component). Equalizing the level of all covariates across the gender groups could potentially reduce the gap by 0.065 percentage points (33.33%= -0.065/-0.195). The substantial portion of the residual part of the gap (38.59%) that could not be explained by such differences was due to gender differences in unobservable (unknown) covariates, which were not included in the model (the constant residual part), and the rest was attributed to the differential effect of the observed covariates.
In terms of more details on the endowments effect, differences in the level of predisposing factors made a significant contribution to the PA gap, accounting for about 30.48%. Among the predisposing factors, work status contributed the most to the gap. This indicates that the gender difference in proportion to this variable (Table 1) accounted for a reduction (as indicated by the positive sign) in the gap by 29.61%. The gender difference in proportion to the history of chronic disease from need-related factors (33.59% in women vs. 22.17% in men) also contributed significantly to the gap, accounting for about 4.55%.
As shown in detail, the differential effects of enabling and need-related factors explained 30.65 and 29.09% of the PA disparity (with respect to the positive sign); however, they were not statistically significant. Among these factors, the standard of living and smoking status made the largest contribution to the disparity. Despite the negative contribution of the predisposing factors, the differential effects of age and ethnicity (Table 2) contributed significantly to the gap, accounting for -78.67 and 35.47%, respectively. However, eliminating the differential effects of ethnicity alone could reduce the gap.
A nonlinear extension of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition method was used to assess the gender difference in SPA prevalence and to determine its contributing factors. A significant gender difference in PA was found. The level of PA in women was far lower than that of men, as defined according to the recommendations of the WHO for health [37,38]. This finding is consistent with the majority of previous reports in this field [4-8,39].
A small portion of the gap could be explained by the heterogeneous distribution of common factors associated with PA behavior. These factors are defined in line with Andersen’s socio-behavioral model model [29] involving 3 sets of related factors, including the factors that have the potential to influence PA behavior— either by encouraging it to occur (predisposing factors) or by inhibiting the behavior from occurring (enabling factors)—and the factors concerning the individual’s perceived need for PA (need-related factors).
According to the findings of this study, the predisposing factors, in particular work status, accounted for the largest contribution to the gender difference in SPA prevalence. This finding is not too far-fetched for 2 reasons: (1) a significant percentage of women are not involved in the labor force [40] and live traditionally as housewives [41]; and (2) the jobs assigned to women demand less PA than those of men. In addition to different work status, the different distribution of the history of chronic diseases in the gender groups plays a somewhat significant role. Chronic diseases can affect PA behavior. In addition, though, it should be noted that a sedentary lifestyle can be a risk factor for chronic diseases, meaning that a two-way relationship must be considered.
As the findings suggest, a substantial portion of gender differences in PA remained unexplained by the uneven distributions of the above factors between the genders. This component accounted for different relationships or associations between these factors and PA in each group, as well as the effects of other unknown factors. The contribution of unknown factors to the PA gap was relatively high. Therefore, future research is strongly recommended to identify and assess the contribution of each unknown factor, along with the other causes involved.
In the unexplained part, the differential effect of enabling factors, particularly standard of living, made a substantial contribution to the disparity. In both men and women, PA decreased as the standard of living improved. As shown in Table 2, this trend was stronger among women than among men.
According to our findings, smoking status was related to PA differently for men than for women, which was one of the reasons for the gender difference in PA. This difference suggests that behavioral responses to smoking may differ between genders due to factors including personality, perceived health risks and benefits, and socioeconomic status [42]. The different distribution of these parameters among men and women may help explain the gender difference in PA. A careful appraisal of this phenomenon may be applied to reduce the PA gap. Thus, investigating the gender difference in the associations between smoking and PA in more detail remains a task for further research.
Among the predisposing factors, the differential effect of ethnicity reduced the gender difference in PA to a remarkable extent. This finding is consistent with the fact that ethnicity plays a major role in shaping traditional attitudes toward women and building a model of traditional family life (wife/mother role), which has restricted working and PA for this segment of society. Because of their ethnic traditions, women experience more difficult and unfair conditions than men, meaning that they are less likely to engage in PA [43]. Therefore, it would be appropriate to conduct another study specifically on the relationships among gender, ethnicity, and PA to identify the informal mechanisms leading to health inequality.
This was the first research project in which the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition technique was adopted to assess the factors contributing to gender differences in PA. It is also novel in that we used data from the WHO’s STEPS. The survey that was the basis of this study was conducted among a representative sample of adults from 31 provinces of Iran and provided comprehensive information on the NCD risk factors of individuals.
Given its design, this paper attempted to identify statistical associations (rather than causal effects) between the observed covariates and gender differences in SPA prevalence. Therefore, we caution against imputing a causal interpretation of our models.
We conclude that Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition can provide deeper insights into all aspects of disparities, thus paving the way toward equality. According to the findings of this research project, it could be argued that interventions to reduce the gap should focus on promoting PA among housewives and women with chronic diseases, as well as in those with higher standards of living. In addition, it is essential to explore the impact of ethnicity and smoking status on women’s PA in order to promote health.
This study was a part of a PhD thesis conducted at Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. The authors thank Iran’s Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MOHME), Center for NCD Control and Management, for providing the required data.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare for this study.

Table 1.
Descriptive statistics by gender for all subjects
All subjects Women Men p-value
Total (n) 10,356 6,067 4,289 -
Sufficient physical activity1 58.10 49.13 70.98 <0.001
Predisposing factors
 Age (yr) 42.04± 0.16 42.32±0.20 41.65 ±0.24 0.03
 Family size (n) 3.94± 0.02 3.81± 0.02 4.12±0.03 <0.001
 Educational status <0.001
 Illiterate 24.93 31.62 15.34
 <High school graduate 36.54 33.71 40.59
 High school graduate 24.36 22.51 27.02
 At least some college 14.17 12.16 17.05
 Work status <0.001
  Employed 31.42 8.99 63.66
  Unemployed 4.64 2.98 7.02
  Non-labor force2 63.94 88.03 29.32
 Ethnicity (1 = Fars, 0 = other3) 48.69 48.36 49.15 0.43
Enabling factors
 Building area (m2) 0.005
  <100 47.16 48.46 45.32 -
  100-200 42.55 41.75 43.67 -
  >200 10.29 9.79 11.00 -
 Housing amenities
  Bathroom 93.01 92.80 93.32 0.31
  Kitchen 91.88 91.41 92.55 0.04
  Vacuum cleaner 84.96 84.35 85.84 0.04
  Computer 43.92 40.27 49.18 <0.001
  Separate freezer 57.65 55.83 60.26 <0.001
  Washing machine 74.89 73.16 77.38 <0.001
 Urban residence 70.15 68.68 71.60 0.001
Need-related factors
 Current smoking 9.92 1.19 22.46 <0.001
 Overweight/obese4 55.35 59.60 49.22 <0.001
 Hypertension 29.71 31.36 27.35 <0.001
 History of related chronic disease5 29.02 33.59 22.17 <0.001

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or %.

1 Achieving 600 metabolic equivalents-min/wk or more as suggested by the World Health Organization.

2 Subjects who had no job and were not looking for work were counted as not in the labor force according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This category included housewives, students, and those unable to work.

3 Including Turk, Lor, Arab, Kurd, Gilak, Turkman, Baluch, Sistani, and others.

4 If the body mass index was 25.0 kg/m2 or higher.

5 Having a history of one or more chronic diseases, including cardio/cerebrovascular disease, osteoporosis, asthma, colon cancer, and/or type 2 diabetes.

Table 2.
Associations of the observed covariates with total physical activity using a multivariable logistic regression model in men and women separately
Women p-value Men p-value
Age in years 1.004 (0.997, 1.010) 0.26 0.990 (0.982, 0.997) 0.007
Family size 1.037 (0.997, 1.078) 0.07 1.050 (0.999, 1.103) 0.06
Educational status1
 < High school graduate 1.316 (1.110, 1.561) 0.002 0.909 (0.713, 1.158) 0.44
 High school graduate 1.393 (1.107, 1.754) 0.005 1.019 (0.755, 1.377) 0.90
 At least some college 1.417 (1.056, 1.900) 0.02 1.061 (0.757, 1.487) 0.73
Work status2
 Unemployed 0.627 (0.367, 1.070) 0.09 0.368 (0.265, 0.512) <0.001
 Non-labor force 0.792 (0.631, 0.994) 0.04 0.606 (0.498, 0.738) <0.001
Ethnicity3 0.849 (0.713, 1.011) 0.07 1.034 (0.829, 1.288) 0.77
Standard of living4 0.611 (0.446, 0.838) 0.002 0.889 (0.576, 1.370) 0.59
Urban residence 0.903 (0.774, 1.054) 0.19 0.901 (0.728, 1.114) 0.33
Current smoking 1.514 (0.880, 2.604) 0.13 0.937 (0.779, 1.127) 0.49
Overweight/obese5 0.923 (0.806, 1.055) 0.24 0.860 (0.728, 1.016) 0.08
Hypertension 0.866 (0.751, 0.998) 0.04 1.000 (0.833, 1.200) 0.99
History of a chronic condition6 0.858 (0.744, 0.990) 0.04 0.687 (0.569, 0.830) <0.001
Constant 1.936 (1.092, 3.431) 0.02 8.169 (3.973, 16.798) <0.001

Values are presented as odds ratio (95% confidence interval).

1 The lowest category, illiterate, was used as the reference category.

2 The category of employed, was used as the reference category.

3 Ethnicity: 1, Fars; 0, other ethnic groups including Turk, Lor, Arab, Kurd, Gilak, Turkman, Baluch, Sistani, and others.

4 Results for sets of predictors, including living area (m2) and having some housing amenities, were subsumed in proxy measures of the standard of living.

5 If the body mass index was 25.0 kg/m2 or higher.

6 Having a history of one or more chronic diseases, including cardio/cerebrovascular disease, osteoporosis, asthma, colon cancer, and type 2 diabetes.

Table 3.
Detailed decomposition of gender disparity in proportion to SPA1 using a nonlinear extension of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition method
Coefficient 95% CI
 p-value Contribution (%)2
LL UL
Total difference -0.195 -0.217 -0.173 <0.001 100.00
 Endowments effect3 -0.065 -0.097 -0.033 <0.001 33.34
 Unexplained effect4 -0.130 -0.168 -0.091 <0.001 66.66
Detailed decomposition: endowments effect
 Predisposing factors -0.059 -0.090 -0.029 <0.001 30.48
  Age in years 0.001 -0.001 0.002 0.49 -0.26
  Family size -0.003 -0.007 0.000 0.05 1.69
  Educational status5 0.001 -0.009 0.011 0.89 -0.33
  Work status6 -0.058 -0.084 -0.031 <0.001 29.61
  Ethnicity7 0.000 -0.002 0.003 0.68 -0.22
 Enabling factors 0.003 -0.003 0.009 0.349 -1.56
  Standard of living8 0.000 -0.004 0.004 0.89 -0.13
  Urban/rural residence 0.001 -0.001 0.002 0.36 -0.30
  Province of current residence 0.002 -0.003 0.007 0.41 -1.12
 Need-related factors -0.009 -0.020 0.002 0.11 4.52
  Smoking status9 0.004 -0.006 0.013 0.47 -1.85
  Overweight/obese10 -0.004 -0.008 0.000 0.08 1.83
  Hypertension 0.000 -0.002 0.002 0.97 -0.02
  History of chronic disease11 -0.009 -0.014 -0.004 <0.001 4.55
Detailed decomposition, unexplained effect
 Predisposing factors 0.062 -0.064 0.188 0.34 -31.76
  Age in years 0.153 0.048 0.259 0.004 -78.67
  Family size -0.013 -0.067 0.041 0.64 6.68
  Educational status5 -0.005 -0.022 0.011 0.51 2.75
  Work status6 -0.004 -0.056 0.048 0.88 2.01
  Ethnicity7 -0.069 -0.109 -0.030 0.001 35.47
 Enabling factors -0.060 -0.174 0.055 0.34 30.65
  Standard of living8 -0.073 -0.186 0.041 0.21 37.36
  Urban/rural residence 0.001 -0.011 0.012 0.93 -0.27
  Province of current residence 0.013 -0.005 0.030 0.16 -6.44
 Need-related factors -0.057 -0.122 0.009 0.09 29.09
  Smoking status9 -0.056 -0.120 0.009 0.09 28.50
  Overweight/obese10 0.003 -0.005 0.011 0.49 -1.45
  Hypertension 0.004 -0.003 0.011 0.22 -2.24
  History of chronic disease11 -0.008 -0.017 0.001 0.07 4.27
 Constant -0.075 -0.251 0.101 0.40 38.59

SPA, sufficient physical activity; CI, confidence interval; LL, lower limit; UL, upper limit.

1 Achieving 600 metabolic equivalents-min/wk or above as suggested by the Wordl Health Organization.

2 A negative number implies that reducing the gender difference in the variable widens the gap.

3 Includes the difference in the level of characteristics between men and women.

4 Includes the differential association of characteristics in each group along with a constant.

5 Educational status: 1, illiterate; 2, less than high school graduate; 3, high school graduate; 4, at least some college.

6 Work status: 1, employed; 2, unemployed; 3, if not considered to be in the labor force according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

7 Ethnicity: 1, Fars; 2, other ethnic groups including Turk, Lor, Arab, Kurd, Gilak, Turkman, Baluch, or Sistani.

8 Results for sets of predictors, including building area (m2) and having some housing amenities were subsumed in proxy measures of standard of living.

9 Smoking status: 1, current smoking; 2, no current smoking.

10 If the body mass index was 25.0 kg/m2 or higher.

11 Having a history of one or more chronic diseases, including cardio/cerebrovascular disease, osteoporosis, asthma, colon cancer, and type 2 diabetes.

  • 1. Institute of Medicine. Health and behavior: the interplay of biological, behavioral, and societal influences. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001. p 93.
  • 2. Sreeramareddy CT, Majeed Kutty NA, Razzaq Jabbar MA, Boo NY. Physical activity and associated factors among young adults in Malaysia: an online exploratory survey. Biosci Trends 2012;6:103-109.ArticlePubMed
  • 3. Södergren M, Sundquist J, Johansson SE, Sundquist K. Physical activity, exercise and self-rated health: a population-based study from Sweden. BMC Public Health 2008;8:352.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 4. Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U, et al. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet 2012;380:247-257.ArticlePubMed
  • 5. Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, Wells JC, Loos RJ, Martin BW, et al. Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet 2012;380:258-271.ArticlePubMed
  • 6. Koohpayehzadeh J, Etemad K, Abbasi M, Meysamie A, Sheikhbahaei S, Asgari F, et al. Gender-specific changes in physical activity pattern in Iran: national surveillance of risk factors of noncommunicable diseases (2007-2011). Int J Public Health 2014;59:231-241.ArticlePubMed
  • 7. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Mâsse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008;40:181-188.ArticlePubMed
  • 8. Saffer H, Dave D, Grossman M, Leung LA. Racial, ethnic, and gender differences in physical activity. J Hum Cap 2013;7:378-410.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 9. Esteghamati A, Khalilzadeh O, Rashidi A, Kamgar M, Meysamie A, Abbasi M. Physical activity in Iran: results of the third national surveillance of risk factors of non-communicable diseases (SuRFNCD-2007). J Phys Act Health 2011;8:27-35.ArticlePubMed
  • 10. Jann B. The Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition for linear regression models. Stata J 2008;8:453-479.Article
  • 11. Oaxaca R. Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. Int Eecon Rev (Philadelphia) 1973;14:693-709.Article
  • 12. Blinder AS. Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural estimates. J Hum Resour 1973;8:436-455.Article
  • 13. Yun MS. Decomposing differences in the first moment. Econ Lett 2004;82:275-280.Article
  • 14. Dubowitz T, Heron M, Basurto-Davila R, Bird CE, Lurie N, Escarce JJ. Racial/ethnic differences in US health behaviors: a decomposition analysis. Am J Health Behav 2011;35:290-304.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 15. Costa-Font J, Fabbri D, Gil J. Decomposing body mass index gaps between Mediterranean countries: a counterfactual quantile regression analysis. Econ Hum Biol 2009;7:351-365.ArticlePubMed
  • 16. Averett SL, Stacey N, Wang Y. Decomposing race and gender differences in underweight and obesity in South Africa. Econ Hum Biol 2014;15:23-40.ArticlePubMed
  • 17. Mehta HB, Rajan SS, Aparasu RR, Johnson ML. Application of the nonlinear Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition to study racial/ethnic disparities in antiobesity medication use in the United States. Res Social Adm Pharm 2013;9:13-26.ArticlePubMed
  • 18. Case A, Menendez A. Sex differences in obesity rates in poor countries: evidence from South Africa. Econ Hum Biol 2009;7:271-282.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 19. Liu H, Fang H, Zhao Z. Urban–rural disparities of child health and nutritional status in China from 1989 to 2006. Econ Hum Biol 2013;11:294-309.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 20. Powell LM, Wada R, Krauss RC, Wang Y. Ethnic disparities in adolescent body mass index in the United States: the role of parental socioeconomic status and economic contextual factors. Soc Sci Med 2012;75:469-476.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 21. Chung W, Lim S, Lee S. Factors influencing gender differences in smoking and their separate contributions: evidence from South Korea. Soc Sci Med 2010;70:1966-1973.ArticlePubMed
  • 22. Lhila A, Long S. What is driving the black–white difference in low birthweight in the US? Health Econ 2012;21:301-315.ArticlePubMed
  • 23. Amin V, Lhila A. Decomposing racial differences in adolescent smoking in the US. Econ Hum Biol 2016;22:161-176.ArticlePubMed
  • 24. Global Health Data Exchange. STEPS noncommunicable disease risk factors survey. [cited 2017 Oct 25]. Available from: http://ghdx.healthdata.org/series/steps-noncommunicable-diseaserisk-factors-survey
  • 25. World Health Organization. STEPwise approach to chronic disease risk factor surveillance. [cited 2015 Feb 21]. Available from: http://www.who.int/chp/steps/iran/en/
  • 26. Esteghamati A, Meysamie A, Khalilzadeh O, Rashidi A, Haghazali M, Asgari F, et al. Third national surveillance of risk factors of non-communicable diseases (SuRFNCD-2007) in Iran: methods and results on prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, obesity, central obesity, and dyslipidemia. BMC Public Health 2009;9:167.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 27. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Appendix 1: translating scientific evidence about total amount and intensity of physical activity into guidelines. [cited 2017 Oct 24]. Available from: https://health.gov/paguidelines/guidelines/appendix1.aspx
  • 28. World Health Organization. Global physical activity surveillance. [cited 2017 Oct 24]. Available from: http://www.who.int/chp/steps/GPAQ/en/
  • 29. Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav 1995;36:1-10.ArticlePubMed
  • 30. Lo KM, Fulda KG. Impact of predisposing, enabling, and need factors in accessing preventive medical care among U.S. children: results of the national survey of children’s health. Osteopath Med Prim Care 2008;2:12.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 31. Andersen RM, Davidson PL, Baumeister SE. Improving access to care. In: Kominski GF, ed. Changing the US health care system: key issues in health services policy and management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2014. p 33-69.
  • 32. Bregger JE, Haugen SE. BLS introduces new range of alternative unemployment measures. Mon Labor Rev 1995;118:19.
  • 33. Fairlie RW. An extension of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition technique to logit and probit models. J Econ Soc Meas 2005;30:305-316.Article
  • 34. Powers DA, Yoshioka H, Yun MS. Mvdcmp: multivariate decomposition for nonlinear response models. Stata J 2011;11:556-576.Article
  • 35. Yun MS. A simple solution to the identification problem in detailed wage decompositions. Econ Inq 2005;43:766-772.Article
  • 36. Fairlie RW. Addressing path dependence and incorporating sample weights in the nonlinear Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition technique for logit, probit and other nonlinear models; 2017 [cited 2017 Oct 25]. Available from: https://siepr.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/17-013.pdf
  • 37. World Health Organization. Global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ) analysis guide. [cited 2017 Oct 25]. Available from: http://www.who.int/chp/steps/resources/GPAQ_Analysis_Guide.pdf
  • 38. World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. [cited 2017 Oct 25]. Available from: http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_recommendations/en/
  • 39. World Health Organization. Prevalence of insufficient physical activity. [cited 2017 Oct 25]. Available from: http://www.who.int/gho/ncd/risk_factors/physical_activity_text/en/
  • 40. Esfahani HS, Shajari P. Gender, education, family structure, and the allocation of labor in Iran. Middle East Dev J 2012;4:1250008.Article
  • 41. Mollahosseini A. Gender and employment in Iran. Indian J Gend Stud 2008;15:159-162.Article
  • 42. Grunberg NE, Winders SE, Wewers ME. Gender differences in tobacco use. Health Psychol 1991;10:143-153.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 43. Taleb M, Goudarzi M. Ethnicity and gender: a study of ethnic groups in Sistan and Baluchestan. Women Dev Polit 2004;2:23-48. (Persian).
Appendix 1.
Decomposition approach using a nonlinear extension of method
epih-39-e2017044-app1.pdf

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Evaluating socioeconomic inequalities in self-rated oral health and its contributing factors in Brazilian older adults
      Fabíola Bof de Andrade, José Leopoldo Ferreira Antunes, Mirza Rustum Baig
      PLOS ONE.2025; 20(1): e0316145.     CrossRef
    • Gender differences in cardiac rehabilitation participation and outcomes: an 18-year retrospective study in Iran
      Marzieh Najafi, Zahra Teimouri-Jervekani, Marjan Jamalian, Hamidreza Roohafza, Mohammad Hossein Paknahad, Mohammad mahdi Hadavi, Neda Dorostkar, Masoumeh Sadeghi
      The Egyptian Heart Journal.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Perioperative Exercise Intention and Influencing Factors: A Multi-Centered Cross-Sectional Study
      Feng Lv, Yuxi Zhang, Su Min, Ping Li, Lihua Peng, Li Ren, Jian Yu, Bin Wang, Yiwei Shen, Shanshan Tong, Juying Jin, Xi Luo, Jing Chen, Yingrui Chen, Yuanyuan Li, Jin Chen, Xing Zeng, Fuquan Luo, Qiuju Xiong, Lei Zou, Yuanyuan Guo, Jun Cao, Qibin Chen, Bin
      Frontiers in Public Health.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Health-Related Quality of Life and Physical Activity in a Community Setting
      Marta Gil-Lacruz, Ana Isabel Gil-Lacruz, Paola Domingo-Torrecilla, Miguel Angel Cañete-Lairla
      International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 18(14): 7301.     CrossRef
    • A detailed explanation and graphical representation of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition method with its application in health inequalities
      Ebrahim Rahimi, Seyed Saeed Hashemi Nazari
      Emerging Themes in Epidemiology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Sex-related Disparities in Access of Patients with STEMI to PCI Hospitals in Brazil: The Contribution of Blinder–Oaxaca Decomposition Method
      Marcos Antonio Almeida-Santos, Taciana Silveira Passos, Jeferson Cunha-Oliveira, Laís Costa Souza Oliveira, Ticiane Clair Remacre Munareto Lima, Larissa Andreline Maia Arcelino, Jussiely Cunha Oliveira, Antonio Carlos Sobral Sousa, José Augusto Soares Bar
      Journal of Health Management.2020; 22(1): 3.     CrossRef

    Decomposing Gender Disparity in Total Physical Activity among Iranian Adults
    Decomposing Gender Disparity in Total Physical Activity among Iranian Adults
    All subjects Women Men p-value
    Total (n) 10,356 6,067 4,289 -
    Sufficient physical activity1 58.10 49.13 70.98 <0.001
    Predisposing factors
     Age (yr) 42.04± 0.16 42.32±0.20 41.65 ±0.24 0.03
     Family size (n) 3.94± 0.02 3.81± 0.02 4.12±0.03 <0.001
     Educational status <0.001
     Illiterate 24.93 31.62 15.34
     <High school graduate 36.54 33.71 40.59
     High school graduate 24.36 22.51 27.02
     At least some college 14.17 12.16 17.05
     Work status <0.001
      Employed 31.42 8.99 63.66
      Unemployed 4.64 2.98 7.02
      Non-labor force2 63.94 88.03 29.32
     Ethnicity (1 = Fars, 0 = other3) 48.69 48.36 49.15 0.43
    Enabling factors
     Building area (m2) 0.005
      <100 47.16 48.46 45.32 -
      100-200 42.55 41.75 43.67 -
      >200 10.29 9.79 11.00 -
     Housing amenities
      Bathroom 93.01 92.80 93.32 0.31
      Kitchen 91.88 91.41 92.55 0.04
      Vacuum cleaner 84.96 84.35 85.84 0.04
      Computer 43.92 40.27 49.18 <0.001
      Separate freezer 57.65 55.83 60.26 <0.001
      Washing machine 74.89 73.16 77.38 <0.001
     Urban residence 70.15 68.68 71.60 0.001
    Need-related factors
     Current smoking 9.92 1.19 22.46 <0.001
     Overweight/obese4 55.35 59.60 49.22 <0.001
     Hypertension 29.71 31.36 27.35 <0.001
     History of related chronic disease5 29.02 33.59 22.17 <0.001
    Women p-value Men p-value
    Age in years 1.004 (0.997, 1.010) 0.26 0.990 (0.982, 0.997) 0.007
    Family size 1.037 (0.997, 1.078) 0.07 1.050 (0.999, 1.103) 0.06
    Educational status1
     < High school graduate 1.316 (1.110, 1.561) 0.002 0.909 (0.713, 1.158) 0.44
     High school graduate 1.393 (1.107, 1.754) 0.005 1.019 (0.755, 1.377) 0.90
     At least some college 1.417 (1.056, 1.900) 0.02 1.061 (0.757, 1.487) 0.73
    Work status2
     Unemployed 0.627 (0.367, 1.070) 0.09 0.368 (0.265, 0.512) <0.001
     Non-labor force 0.792 (0.631, 0.994) 0.04 0.606 (0.498, 0.738) <0.001
    Ethnicity3 0.849 (0.713, 1.011) 0.07 1.034 (0.829, 1.288) 0.77
    Standard of living4 0.611 (0.446, 0.838) 0.002 0.889 (0.576, 1.370) 0.59
    Urban residence 0.903 (0.774, 1.054) 0.19 0.901 (0.728, 1.114) 0.33
    Current smoking 1.514 (0.880, 2.604) 0.13 0.937 (0.779, 1.127) 0.49
    Overweight/obese5 0.923 (0.806, 1.055) 0.24 0.860 (0.728, 1.016) 0.08
    Hypertension 0.866 (0.751, 0.998) 0.04 1.000 (0.833, 1.200) 0.99
    History of a chronic condition6 0.858 (0.744, 0.990) 0.04 0.687 (0.569, 0.830) <0.001
    Constant 1.936 (1.092, 3.431) 0.02 8.169 (3.973, 16.798) <0.001
    Coefficient 95% CI
    		 p-value Contribution (%)2
    LL UL
    Total difference -0.195 -0.217 -0.173 <0.001 100.00
     Endowments effect3 -0.065 -0.097 -0.033 <0.001 33.34
     Unexplained effect4 -0.130 -0.168 -0.091 <0.001 66.66
    Detailed decomposition: endowments effect
     Predisposing factors -0.059 -0.090 -0.029 <0.001 30.48
      Age in years 0.001 -0.001 0.002 0.49 -0.26
      Family size -0.003 -0.007 0.000 0.05 1.69
      Educational status5 0.001 -0.009 0.011 0.89 -0.33
      Work status6 -0.058 -0.084 -0.031 <0.001 29.61
      Ethnicity7 0.000 -0.002 0.003 0.68 -0.22
     Enabling factors 0.003 -0.003 0.009 0.349 -1.56
      Standard of living8 0.000 -0.004 0.004 0.89 -0.13
      Urban/rural residence 0.001 -0.001 0.002 0.36 -0.30
      Province of current residence 0.002 -0.003 0.007 0.41 -1.12
     Need-related factors -0.009 -0.020 0.002 0.11 4.52
      Smoking status9 0.004 -0.006 0.013 0.47 -1.85
      Overweight/obese10 -0.004 -0.008 0.000 0.08 1.83
      Hypertension 0.000 -0.002 0.002 0.97 -0.02
      History of chronic disease11 -0.009 -0.014 -0.004 <0.001 4.55
    Detailed decomposition, unexplained effect
     Predisposing factors 0.062 -0.064 0.188 0.34 -31.76
      Age in years 0.153 0.048 0.259 0.004 -78.67
      Family size -0.013 -0.067 0.041 0.64 6.68
      Educational status5 -0.005 -0.022 0.011 0.51 2.75
      Work status6 -0.004 -0.056 0.048 0.88 2.01
      Ethnicity7 -0.069 -0.109 -0.030 0.001 35.47
     Enabling factors -0.060 -0.174 0.055 0.34 30.65
      Standard of living8 -0.073 -0.186 0.041 0.21 37.36
      Urban/rural residence 0.001 -0.011 0.012 0.93 -0.27
      Province of current residence 0.013 -0.005 0.030 0.16 -6.44
     Need-related factors -0.057 -0.122 0.009 0.09 29.09
      Smoking status9 -0.056 -0.120 0.009 0.09 28.50
      Overweight/obese10 0.003 -0.005 0.011 0.49 -1.45
      Hypertension 0.004 -0.003 0.011 0.22 -2.24
      History of chronic disease11 -0.008 -0.017 0.001 0.07 4.27
     Constant -0.075 -0.251 0.101 0.40 38.59
    Table 1. Descriptive statistics by gender for all subjects

    Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or %.

    Achieving 600 metabolic equivalents-min/wk or more as suggested by the World Health Organization.

    Subjects who had no job and were not looking for work were counted as not in the labor force according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This category included housewives, students, and those unable to work.

    Including Turk, Lor, Arab, Kurd, Gilak, Turkman, Baluch, Sistani, and others.

    If the body mass index was 25.0 kg/m2 or higher.

    Having a history of one or more chronic diseases, including cardio/cerebrovascular disease, osteoporosis, asthma, colon cancer, and/or type 2 diabetes.

    Table 2. Associations of the observed covariates with total physical activity using a multivariable logistic regression model in men and women separately

    Values are presented as odds ratio (95% confidence interval).

    The lowest category, illiterate, was used as the reference category.

    The category of employed, was used as the reference category.

    Ethnicity: 1, Fars; 0, other ethnic groups including Turk, Lor, Arab, Kurd, Gilak, Turkman, Baluch, Sistani, and others.

    Results for sets of predictors, including living area (m2) and having some housing amenities, were subsumed in proxy measures of the standard of living.

    If the body mass index was 25.0 kg/m2 or higher.

    Having a history of one or more chronic diseases, including cardio/cerebrovascular disease, osteoporosis, asthma, colon cancer, and type 2 diabetes.

    Table 3. Detailed decomposition of gender disparity in proportion to SPA1 using a nonlinear extension of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition method

    SPA, sufficient physical activity; CI, confidence interval; LL, lower limit; UL, upper limit.

    Achieving 600 metabolic equivalents-min/wk or above as suggested by the Wordl Health Organization.

    A negative number implies that reducing the gender difference in the variable widens the gap.

    Includes the difference in the level of characteristics between men and women.

    Includes the differential association of characteristics in each group along with a constant.

    Educational status: 1, illiterate; 2, less than high school graduate; 3, high school graduate; 4, at least some college.

    Work status: 1, employed; 2, unemployed; 3, if not considered to be in the labor force according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    Ethnicity: 1, Fars; 2, other ethnic groups including Turk, Lor, Arab, Kurd, Gilak, Turkman, Baluch, or Sistani.

    Results for sets of predictors, including building area (m2) and having some housing amenities were subsumed in proxy measures of standard of living.

    Smoking status: 1, current smoking; 2, no current smoking.

    If the body mass index was 25.0 kg/m2 or higher.

    Having a history of one or more chronic diseases, including cardio/cerebrovascular disease, osteoporosis, asthma, colon cancer, and type 2 diabetes.

    Table 1.

    Table 2.

    Table 3.

    Epidemiol Health : Epidemiology and Health
    © Korean Society of Epidemiology.
    TOP