epiH Search

CLOSE



Epidemiol Health > Volume 37; 2015 > Article
Bae: Epidemiological evidences on overdiagnosis of prostate and kidney cancers in Korean

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

The prostate specific antigen test is widely used as the main method of screening prostate cancer in Korea. Additionally, the use of ultrasound sonography may lead to overdiagnosis of kidney cancer as well as thyroid cancer. This study aimed to highlight epidemiological evidences regarding overdiagnosis of prostate and kidney cancers in Korean.

METHODS:

The annual trends of national incidence and mortality of prostate and kidney cancers provided by the Korean Statistical Information Service were evaluated.

RESULTS:

The rate of increase in the incidence of prostate and kidney cancer was 6 and 5 times higher than that of mortality between 2000 and 2011, respectively. Additionally, the age group showing the highest incidence in prostate cancer shifted from 85 years and older to 75-79 years.

CONCLUSIONS:

This evidence suggests that prostate and kidney cancers are overdiagnosed in Korea. Further research in this area, using national cancer registry databases, should be encouraged to prevent overdiagnosis.

INTRODUCTION

Cancer screening, which reduces cancer mortality through early detection, inevitably leads to the problem of overdiagnosis [1]. Overdiagnosis is defined as ‘detection of cancers that would never have been found were it not for the screening test’ [2], and is regarded as a harmful aspect of screening testing because it results in unnecessary overtreatment [3]. In South Korea (hereafter Korea), concerns have recently been raised regarding the overdiagnosis of thyroid [4] and breast cancers [5].
A debate on overdiagnosis occurs when a cancer screening project is introduced, or new screening tests for early detection of cancer are developed [2]. In the West, there have been claims of overdiagnosis relating to thyroid, breast, prostate, and kidney cancers [1]; however, in Korea, where testing for prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels in blood is universal, an investigation of overdiagnosis of prostate cancer would provide important evidence for cancer management policies.
In addition, thyroid cancer shows the highest incidence among cancers in the Korean population [6], leading to claims of overdiagnosis due to expansion and supply of ultrasound testing devices [4]. However, ultrasound devices can increase the likelihood of discovering incidental cancer in the neck and in the abdominal organs [7]. Thus, one might suspect that kidney cancer is also currently being overdiagnosed. With respect to these questions, author aimed to investigate the epidemiological evidences on overdiagnosis of prostate and kidney cancers in Koreans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The judgement criterion for the presence of overdiagnosis is that mortality does not change substantially compared to an in crease in incidence [2]. The annual trends of national incidence and mortality of prostate and kidney cancers provided by the Korean Statistical Information Service (KOSIS) [8] were evaluated.

RESULTS

Prostate cancer

Welch and Black [1] presented evidence for prostate cancer overdiagnosis in that the incidence increased considerably immediately after an introduction of PSA screening; however, there was little change in mortality. There is similar evidence in relation to the overdiagnosis of thyroid cancer in Korea [7]. Figure 1(A) shows the annual incidence and mortality of prostate cancer provided by the KOSIS [8]. Compared with 2000, mortality in 2011 had increased by 3.3 (=5.6-2.3) deaths per 100,000 people, while prevalence increased by 20.4 (=27.7-7.3) cases per 100,000 people—a 6-fold increase (=20.4/ 3.3). This is the first piece of epidemiological evidences on the overdiagnosis of prostate cancer.
At the same time, Hilton et al. [9] reported that the age of diagnosis had decreased since the expansion of PSA testing. Accordingly, Figure 1(B) describes the incidence for different age groups of Korean males over the last 10 years. The age group with the highest incidence shows a shifting trend, from the over-85 group in 2001, to the 80 to 84 years group from 2003 to 2009, and the 75 to 79 years group in 2011. This is the second piece of epidemiological evidences on overdiagnosis. However, for the evidence to be more convincing, it is necessary to determine whether there has been a change in the distribution of disease stage at diagnosis [10].

Kidney cancer

Approximately 10% of kidney cancers were incidental cancers in the early 1970s; however, with the development of various imaging technologies such as computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, this increased to approximately 60% in the 1990s [7]. Accordingly, the majority of kidney cancers are discovered incidentally while performing radiological tests for other purposes [11]. Compared with symptomatic tumors, incidental tumors are smaller, have favorable prognostic scores, and are less likely to metastasize [12]. As more incidental cancers are diagnosed, the incidence of kidney cancer will increase. Meanwhile, mortality is not expected to change, and even if it increases, the magnitude of change is not expected to be as large as that for incidence. This line of reasoning can explain the phenomenon in developed countries with a high economic level whereby the incidence of kidney cancer is high but mortality is low [13].
With the rate of detection of incidental cancer increasing following the proliferation of radiodiagnostic machines, any large discrepancy between an increase in incidence and increase in mortality provides epidemiological evidence of overdiagnosis [1]. While mortality in kidney cancer doubled in the US between 1971 and 2010, incidence increased 5-fold [14]. In particular, a report showing a significant change in incidence supports a conclusion of overdiagnosis due to changes in the healthcare environment rather than in relation to age group or birth cohort over time [15]. Figure 2A shows the incidence and mortality trends of kidney cancer from 2000 to 2011 provided by the KOSIS [8]. Compared with 2000, mortality in 2011 had increased by 1.5-fold (=1.7/1.1), while incidence had doubled (=6.0/3.0); thus, there appears to be little difference. However, as mortality increased by 0.6 (=1.7-1.1) deaths per 100,000 people and incidence increased by 3.0 (=6.0-3.0) cases per 100,000 people, the rate of increase was 5 times (=3.0/0.6) higher for incidence compared with mortality. In other words, based on the difference in the slope of the curve in Figure 2, the gap between incidence and mortality is increasing with time to date.
Meanwhile, one of epidemiological characteristics of kidney cancer is that it is twice as common in males compared with females [16]. Figure 2B presents the pattern of increase for incidence and mortality in females. Over the same time-period, the rate of increase for incidence was 2.2 times (=2/0.9) higher than mortality for males, and 6.0 times (=1.8/0.3) higher for females. Given that thyroid cancer, as detected by neck ultrasound, is far higher in females [6], future research will be necessary to investigate whether the larger discrepancy shown for females with kidney cancer is related to the diffusion of ultrasound.

Esophageal cancer

As mentioned above, if overdiagnosis of prostate cancer and kidney cancer results from expanded testing, other cancers that are the target of screening might also be overdiagnosed. In terms of national cancer screening, upper endoscopy for gastric cancer and mammography for breast cancer, at 70.9% each, are the most common clinical examinations [17]. With regards to upper endoscopy, the most commonly used method in screening, is it possible that esophageal cancer could be overdiagnosed given that the process involves transit through the esophagus to the stomach?
Figure 3 shows the annual incidence and mortality for esophageal cancer provided by the KOSIS [8]. Between 2000 and 2011, both incidence and mortality decreased or were unchanged. These data demonstrate that there was no overdiagnosis of esophageal cancer, despite the performance of upper endoscopies. Accordingly, overdiagnosis occurs when a ‘length time bias’ is introduced due to the expansion of screening programmes for indolent cancers [2,3].

DISCUSSION

There is a need for caution when interpreting the phenomenon of incidence-mortality discrepancy given as epidemiological evidences of overdiagnosis in Figure 1(A) and Figure 2(A). The reason, in terms of prostate cancer, can be explained by increased screening provision, improved diagnostic sensitivity, and changes in risk factors [19]. The discrepancy for kidney cancer can also be explained by increased testing, development of new screening methods such as genetic testing, changes in terms of risk factors such as quitting smoking, development of effective treatments, and medical care provision systems [16,18].
Given the volume of epidemiological evidence relating to overdiagnosis, natural history studies of the pertinent cancers are required to determine its extent [2,16]. In other words, there is a need to calculate the scale of overdiagnosis in order to evaluate the risk-benefit payoff of screening [2]. Also, evidences relating to the phenomenon of the smaller size and lower stage of cancer at diagnosis in cases of overdiagnosis should be provided in the national cancer registration data managed by the Korea Central Cancer Registry (KCCR) [2,9]. With research limitations due to the reinforcement of personal information protection [20], author recommends the KCCR to take the lead in using the cancer registration data, constructed with the purpose of calculating national cancer statistics, to produce useful data for the development of cancer management policies. In addition, multifaceted research activities by healthcare workers to minimize overdiagnosis are also necessary [2].

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was conducted with the support of funds for the promotion of research from Jeju National University in 2014.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare for this study.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Supplementary material is available at http://www.e-epih.org/.

Figure 1.
Prostate cancer in Korean men. (A) Age-adjusted incidence and mortality between 2000 and 2011. (B) Age-adjusted incidence in 2001, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2009, and 2011 by age group.
epih-37-e2015015f1.tif
Figure 2.
Age-adjusted incidence and mortality of kidney cancer between 2000 and 2011 in (A) all Koreans and (B) in Korean women.
epih-37-e2015015f2.tif
Figure 3.
Age-adjusted incidence and mortality of esophageal cancer between 2000 and 2011 in the Korean population.
epih-37-e2015015f3.tif

REFERENCES

1. Welch HG, Black WC. Overdiagnosis in cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010; 102: 605-613. PMID: 20413742
crossref pmid
2. Bae JM. Overdiagnosis: epidemiologic concepts and estimation. Epidemiol Health 2015; 37: e2015004. PMID: 25824531
crossref pmid pmc
3. Dahm P, Neuberger M, Ilic D. Screening for prostate cancer: shaping the debate on benefits and harms. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 9: ED000067.
crossref
4. Ahn HS, Kim HJ, Welch HG. Korea’s thyroid-cancer “epidemic”-screening and overdiagnosis. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 1765-1767. PMID: 25372084
crossref pmid
5. Bae JM. On the benefits and harms of mammography for breast cancer screening in Korean women. Korean J Fam Pract 2014; 1: 1-6 (Korean). PMID: 2014
pmid
6. Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, Oh CM, Lee DH, Lee JS. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2011. Cancer Res Treat 2014; 46: 109-123. PMID: 24851102
crossref pmid pmc pdf
7. Ng CS, Wood CG, Silverman PM, Tannir NM, Tamboli P, Sandler CM. Renal cell carcinoma: diagnosis, staging, and surveillance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191: 1220-1232. PMID: 18806169
crossref pmid
8. Korean Statistical Information Service. National cancer statistics. [cited 2015 Jan 30]. Available from: http://kosis.kr/statisticsList/statisticsList_01List.jsp?vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&parentId=A#SubCont (Korean).

9. Hilton WM, Padalecki SS, Ankerst DP, Leach RJ, Thompson IM. Temporal changes in the clinical approach to diagnosing prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2012; 2012: 162-168. PMID: 23271768
crossref pmid pmc
10. Li J, German R, King J, Joseph D, Thompson T, Wu XC, et al. Recent trends in prostate cancer testing and incidence among men under age of 50. Cancer Epidemiol 2012; 36: 122-127. PMID: 22112545
crossref pmid
11. Krajewski KM, Giardino AA, Zukotynski K, Van den Abbeele AD, Pedrosa I. Imaging in renal cell carcinoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2011; 25: 687-715. PMID: 21763963
crossref pmid
12. Rabjerg M, Mikkelsen MN, Walter S, Marcussen N. Incidental renal neoplasms: is there a need for routine screening? A Danish single-center epidemiological study. APMIS 2014; 122: 708-714. PMID: 24910251
crossref pmid
13. Znaor A, Lortet-Tieulent J, Laversanne M, Jemal A, Bray F. International variations and trends in renal cell carcinoma incidence and mortality. Eur Urol 2015; 67: 519-530. PMID: 25449206
crossref pmid
14. Leveridge MJ, Bostrom PJ, Koulouris G, Finelli A, Lawrentschuk N. Imaging renal cell carcinoma with ultrasonography, CT and MRI. Nat Rev Urol 2010; 7: 311-325. PMID: 20479778
crossref pmid
15. Tyson MD, Humphreys MR, Parker AS, Thiel DD, Joseph RW, Andrews PE, et al. Age-period-cohort analysis of renal cell carcinoma in United States adults. Urology 2013; 82: 43-47. PMID: 23706585
crossref pmid
16. Cairns P. Renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Biomark 2010; 9: 461-473. PMID: 22112490
crossref pmid pmc
17. Suh M, Choi KS, Lee YY, Jun JK. Trends in cancer screening rates among Korean men and women: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, 2004-2012. Cancer Res Treat 2013; 45: 86-94. PMID: 23864841
crossref pmid pmc pdf
18. Etzioni R, Gulati R, Mallinger L, Mandelblatt J. Influence of study features and methods on overdiagnosis estimates in breast and prostate cancer screening. Ann Intern Med 2013; 158: 831-838. PMID: 23732716
crossref pmid pmc
19. Zhu Y, Wang HK, Qu YY, Ye DW. Prostate cancer in East Asia: evolving trend over the last decade. Asian J Androl 2015; 17: 48-57. PMID: 25080928
crossref pmid pmc
20. Bae JM. Global trends in the use of nationwide big data for solving healthcare problems. J Korean Med Assoc 2014; 57: 386-390 (Korean).
crossref


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR AUTHORS AND REVIEWERS
Editorial Office
Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center
323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10408, Korea
TEL: +82-2-745-0662   FAX: +82-2-764-8328    E-mail: enh0662@gmail.com

Copyright © 2019 by Korean Society of Epidemiology. All rights reserved.

Developed in M2community

Close layer
prev next