-
Efflux-mediated resistance identified among norfloxacin resistant clinical strains of group B Streptococcus from South Korea
-
Trang Nguyen Doan Dang, Usha Srinivasan, Zachary Britt, Carl F. Marrs, Lixin Zhang, Moran Ki, Betsy Foxman
-
Epidemiol Health. 2014;36:e2014022. Published online October 11, 2014
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih/e2014022
-
-
18,348
View
-
124
Download
-
7
Web of Science
-
7
Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Group B Streptococcus (GBS), a common bowel commensal, is a major cause of neonatal sepsis and an emerging cause of infection in immune-compromised adult populations. Fluoroquinolones are used to treat GBS infections in those allergic to beta-lactams, but GBS are increasingly resistant to fluoroquinolones. Fluoroquinolone resistance has been previously attributed to quinolone resistance determining regions (QRDRs) mutations. We demonstrate that some of fluoroquinolone resistance is due to efflux-mediated resistance.
METHODS We tested 20 GBS strains resistant only to norfloxacin with no mutations in the QRDRs, for the efflux phenotype using norfloxacin and ethidium bromide as substrates in the presence of the efflux inhibitor reserpine. Also tested were 68 GBS strains resistant only to norfloxacin not screened for QRDRs, and 58 GBS strains resistant to ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin or moxifloxacin. Isolates were randomly selected from 221 pregnant women (35-37 weeks of gestation) asymptomatically carrying GBS, and 838 patients with GBS infection identified in South Korea between 2006 and 2008. The VITEK II automatic system (Biomerieux, Durham, NC, USA) was used to determine fluoroquinolone resistance.
RESULTS The reserpine associated efflux phenotype was found in more than half of GBS strains resistant only to norfloxacin with no QRDR mutations, and half where QRDR mutations were unknown. No evidence of the efflux phenotype was detected in GBS strains that were resistant to moxifloxacin or levofloxacin or both. The reserpine sensitive efflux phenotype resulted in moderate increases in norfloxacin minimum inhibitory concentration (average=3.6 fold, range=>1-16 fold).
CONCLUSIONS A substantial portion of GBS strains resistant to norfloxacin have an efflux phenotype.
-
Summary
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Fluoroquinolones tackling antimicrobial resistance: Rational design, mechanistic insights and comparative analysis of norfloxacin vs ciprofloxacin derivatives
Aanchal Khanna, Nitish Kumar, Rupali Rana, Jyoti, Anchal Sharma, Muskan, Harmandeep Kaur, Preet Mohinder Singh Bedi Bioorganic Chemistry.2024; 153: 107773. CrossRef - A review of antibiotic resistance in Group B Streptococcus: the story so far
Katherine Hayes, Fiona O’Halloran, Lesley Cotter Critical Reviews in Microbiology.2020; 46(3): 253. CrossRef - Tackling Multidrug Resistance in Streptococci – From Novel Biotherapeutic Strategies to Nanomedicines
Cinthia Alves-Barroco, Lorenzo Rivas-García, Alexandra R. Fernandes, Pedro Viana Baptista Frontiers in Microbiology.2020;[Epub] CrossRef - Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Streptococcus agalactiae Invasive Isolates Recovered in Argentina
Bárbara Arias, Verónica Kovacec, Laura Vigliarolo, Mariana Suárez, Carina Tersigni, Loana Müller, Horacio Lopardo, Laura Bonofiglio, Marta Mollerach Microbial Drug Resistance.2019; 25(5): 739. CrossRef - Multidrug efflux pumps of Gram-positive bacteria
Bryan D. Schindler, Glenn W. Kaatz Drug Resistance Updates.2016; 27: 1. CrossRef - Fluoroquinolone Resistance among Clonal Complex 1 Group BStreptococcusStrains
Alefiya Neemuchwala, Sarah Teatero, Samir N. Patel, Nahuel Fittipaldi Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology.2016; 2016: 1. CrossRef - Molecular Analysis of Rising Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Belgian Non-Invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates (1995-2014)
Pieter-Jan Ceyssens, Françoise Van Bambeke, Wesley Mattheus, Sophie Bertrand, Frédéric Fux, Eddie Van Bossuyt, Sabrina Damée, Henry-Jean Nyssen, Stéphane De Craeye, Jan Verhaegen, Paul M. Tulkens, Raymond Vanhoof, Eliane Namie Miyaji PLOS ONE.2016; 11(5): e0154816. CrossRef
|