Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Epidemiol Health : Epidemiology and Health

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Epidemiol Health > Volume 47; 2025 > Article
Correspondence
Letter to the Editor: Safety of combination therapy of azilsartan medoxomil and amlodipine: a population-based cohort study
Zhanyi Zhouorcid
Epidemiol Health 2025;47:e2025053.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2025053
Published online: September 20, 2025

Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China

Correspondence: Zhanyi Zhou, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, 548 Binwen Road, Binjiang District, Hangzhou 310053, China E-mail: 201812210101030@zcmu.edu.cn
• Received: August 12, 2025   • Accepted: August 22, 2025

© 2025, Korean Society of Epidemiology

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

prev next
  • 4,331 Views
  • 86 Download
See letter "Authors’ Reply: Safety of combination therapy of azilsartan medoxomil and amlodipine: a population-based cohort study" in Volume 47 on page e2025054.
See the article "Safety of combination therapy of azilsartan medoxomil and amlodipine: a population-based cohort study" on page e2025029.
Dear Editor,
We read with great interest the recent article by Lee et al. [1], “Safety of combination therapy of azilsartan medoxomil and amlodipine: a population-based cohort study.” The authors are to be commended for their rigorous real-world evaluation, which included adjustment for numerous comorbidities such as chronic liver disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, and cerebrovascular and coronary artery disease. Nonetheless, we note that heart failure was not included among the baseline comorbidities examined.
Although the absence of a heart failure subgroup analysis may not invalidate the overall conclusions, it remains clinically important. In patients with hypertension and concomitant heart failure, who frequently have compromised hemodynamics, angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) therapy alone has been shown in randomized trials to increase the risk of hypotension by approximately 63% compared with placebo [2]. This concern may be particularly relevant for azilsartan medoxomil, a novel ARB with greater blood pressure–lowering potency than many older agents. When considering whether its safety profile truly parallels that of other ARBs, the potential for more pronounced blood pressure reduction in patients with hypertension and concomitant heart failure should be taken into account, as such patients may be especially susceptible to symptomatic hypotension and related complications.
Importantly, a systematic review reported that in symptomatic heart failure patients, ARB therapy was associated with a significantly higher risk of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events compared with control (prevalence ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.09 to 1.30), with hypotension being among the most common causes [3]. Furthermore, studies in older heart failure patients have demonstrated that valsartan use was linked to higher rates of hypotension, renal dysfunction, and hyperkalemia [4]. These findings underscore the importance of assessing this high-risk subgroup when evaluating the safety of ARB-based regimens.
Given that ARBs are central to both hypertension and guideline-directed heart failure management, explicitly assessing safety outcomes in the subgroup of patients with hypertension and concomitant heart failure would provide valuable guidance for clinical practice. We believe such analyses should not only be incorporated into secondary evaluations of the present study, but also be routinely considered in future safety research on other ARB-based regimens, to ensure that findings are generalizable across both the general population of individuals with hypertension and this higher-risk subgroup.
We appreciate the authors’ valuable contribution and hope that our suggestion will help refine the evidence base supporting the safe and effective use of ARBs in diverse patient populations.

Ethics statement

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare for this study.

Funding

None.

Acknowledgements

None.

Author contributions

All work was done by ZZ.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      Related articles
      Letter to the Editor: Safety of combination therapy of azilsartan medoxomil and amlodipine: a population-based cohort study
      Letter to the Editor: Safety of combination therapy of azilsartan medoxomil and amlodipine: a population-based cohort study

      Epidemiol Health : Epidemiology and Health
      TOP