KSE
Articles
- Page Path
- HOME > Epidemiol Health > Volume 41; 2019 > Article
-
Original Article
Dietary patterns, nutrition, and risk of breast cancer: a case-control study in the west of Iran -
Behjat Marzbani1
, Javad Nazari2, Farid Najafi3, Behnaz Marzbani4, Sara Shahabadi1, Mahin Amini3, Mehdi Moradinazar3, Yahya Pasdar5, Ebrahim Shakiba6, Saeed Amini7 -
Epidemiol Health 2019;41:e2019003.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2019003
Published online: January 24, 2019
1Health Education and Promotion Group, Vice Chancellor for Health Affairs, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
2Department of Pediatric, School of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
3Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health, School of Public Health, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
4Family and School Health Group, Health Network of Kermanshah, Vice Chancellor for Health Affairs, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
5Nutritional Sciences Department, School of Public Health, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
6Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Medical School, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
7Department of Health Services Management, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
- Correspondence: Mehdi Moradinazar Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health, School of Public Health, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah 6719851351, Iran E-mail: m.moradinazar@gmail.com
• Received: August 7, 2018 • Accepted: January 24, 2019
©2019, Korean Society of Epidemiology
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
-
OBJECTIVES
- Unhealthy dietary patterns are the most important changeable risk factors for breast cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between dietary patterns and the risk of breast cancer among under-50 year women in the west of Iran.
-
METHODS
- All women under 50 years old with pathologically confirmed breast cancer between 2013 and 2015 who were referred to oncology clinics in the west of Iran, and 408 under-50 women referred to other outpatient clinics who were without breast or other cancers at the time of the study and 2 years later were selected as the control group. The data were collected using the middle-aged periodical care form of the Iranian Ministry of Health and analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression in Stata.
-
RESULTS
- The most powerful risk factor for breast cancer was fried foods; the odds ratio of consuming fried foods more than once a month for breast cancer was 4.5 (95% confidence interval, 2.1 to 9.4). A dose-response model indicated that increasing vegetable and fruit consumption up to 90 servings per month decreased the odds of breast cancer, but consuming more than 90 servings per month increased the risk.
-
CONCLUSIONS
- Inadequate consumption of vegetables and consumption of soft drinks, industrially produced juices, fried foods, and sweets were identified as risk factors for breast cancer. In response to these findings, it is necessary to raise awareness and to provide education about healthy diets and the need to change unhealthy dietary patterns.
- Cancer is one of the most important causes of death throughout the world [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) has predicted that cancer-related deaths will affect 24 million people by 2035. Breast cancer is one of the most common types of cancer, and it is the leading cause of cancer deaths among women in both developing and developed countries [1-3]. The WHO has reported that the incidence of breast cancer is increasing by between 1.8% and 2.0% annually around the world [4]. During 2005 to 2020 nearly 26% increase in breast cancer cases occurs and the increase is expected to be higher in developing countries [1,2].
- The epidemiological model of breast cancer in Iran is similar to that of other east Mediterranean and developing countries [2]. On the basis of the cancer registration report of the Iranian Ministry of Health, breast cancer, with an age-standardized incidence rate of 28.2%, is the most prevalent cancer among Iranian women. The mean age of breast cancer patients is 10 to 15 years lower in Iran than in developed countries and the global mean age; previous studies have indicated that the mean age of breast cancer patients in Iran is between 40 years old to 50 years old [5,6]. Mousavi et al. [7] reported that 23% of cases of breast cancer in Iranians were diagnosed in patients younger than 40 years old, 70% of whom were diagnosed in the progressive stage of the disease. However, early diagnosis of the disease, especially in the first stages, is very important for reducing mortality from breast cancer [6].
- The American Cancer Society has identified several risk factors for breast cancer, including age, gender, family history, early menstruation, hysterectomy, fibrocystic history, family history of uterine and ovarian cancers, and history of radiation into the chest; the majority of these risk factors are unchangeable [8]. However, other studies have identified changeable risk factors for breast cancer, including dietary patterns. A significant relationship exists between different dietary patterns and the risk of breast cancer [9,10], and correcting dietary patterns can prevent one-third of the morbidity and mortality of breast cancer [11].
- Few studies have assessed the changeable risk factors of breast cancer in Iran, especially the role of dietary patterns [12,13]. Regional variation in the incidence of breast cancer and the numerous risk factors of breast cancer have necessitated studies on dietary patterns as an effective changeable factor for preventing breast cancer. This study assessed the relationship between dietary patterns and the risk of breast cancer.
INTRODUCTION
- Study population
- This case-control study was performed among 620 women (212 cases and 408 controls) in Kermanshah Province, in the west of Iran. In the first phase, all women under 50 years old with pathologically confirmed breast cancer (235 cases) between 2013 and 2015 who were referred to the radiation therapy, oncology, and chemotherapy clinics of the cancer diagnosis referral center in the west of Iran (Imam Reza Hospital) were selected as the cases. As Figure 1 indicates, 25 patients were excluded, including 1 (4.0%) Iraqi because of language difficulties, 2 (8.0%) men, 13 (52.0%) persons who did not feel that they were in a suitable spiritual situation to participate in the study because of the recent diagnosis of their disease, and 9 (36%) persons who declined to participate in the study. The control group was then selected randomly among patients referred to other wards of the Imam Reza Hospital. For each case, 2 controls were enrolled, with the criteria of not currently having breast cancer and lacking a previous history of any cancer.
- In the second phase, the case and control patients were matched by age, with a 4-year range. Due to the possibility of breast cancer incidence in the control group, all persons in the control group were followed for 2 years. During this time period, 28 persons were excluded from the control group: 6 (21.4%) because of having other cancers, 9 (32.2%) persons because of suspicion of breast cancer based on symptoms, 11 (39.2%) persons due to lack of a response, and 2 (7.1%) persons because of pathologically confirmed breast cancer. These 2 persons were added to the case group (Figure 1).
- Data collection
- Data were collected through verbal interviews, a review of medical records, and telephone follow-ups. To collect data on additional demographic and anthropometric variables, the middle-aged integrated health care form of the Iranian Ministry of Health was used to assess dietary patterns [14]. This questionnaire is used routinely by Iranian Ministry of Health to assess individuals’ diet. The validity and reliability of this questionnaire has been confirmed by previous studies [15]. It includes 11 questions regarding nutritional status and dietary habits (consuming dairy products, vegetables, fruits, fast foods, soft drinks, industrially produced juices, fats and solid oils, salt, fried foods, sweets, and low-nutritional-value snacks). The amount of standardized servings usually consumed in a day was used to measure the consumption of dairy products, vegetables, and fruits.
- As indicated in Table 1, a favorable amount of daily consumption of dairy products is 2-3 servings per day, and the corresponding values for fruits and vegetables are 2-4 servings and 3-5 servings, respectively. The survey inquired whether the participants had consumed fast foods, soft drinks, industrially produced juices, salt, fried and high-fat foods, sweets, and low-nutritional-value snacks. For these products, responses of never or once a month were considered favorable, while responses of 2 times or more per month were considered unfavorable. Consumption of vegetable-based oils was considered favorable, while consumption of solid, semi-solid, animal, or a mixture of liquid and solid fats was considered unfavorable (Table 1).
- Ethical statement
- Before collecting the data, informed consent was obtained from the participants. All ethical considerations, including obtaining verbal consent, were approved by the Ethical Committee of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences.
- Data analysis
- The relationships between the variables were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Variables with a p-value <0.3 in the univariate analysis were entered into the multivariate model. Then, using forward or backward methods, variables with a p-value more than 0.05 were removed from the model.
- Fractional polynomials were used to quantify the effects of patterns of food consumption on the odds of breast cancer. Fractional polynomials are an alternative to regular polynomials that provide flexible parameterization for continuous variables. In this method, the effects of demographic variables and body mass index (BMI) on breast cancer risk were first controlled. Then, the impact of food consumption models was assessed. Fewer than 1% of the data points were missing, and missing data points were deleted from the study. All analyses were performed using Stata version 14.1 (StataCorp., College Station, TX, USA) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
- In total, 620 women under 50 years old (212 cases and 408 controls) were studied. Their mean age was 41.5±6.2 years and 39.5± 7.1 years for the case and control groups, respectively. No statistically significant relationship was found between breast cancer and place of residence, marital status, employment status, insurance coverage, or BMI in the univariate and multivariate analyses. The odds ratio (OR) of breast cancer increased with higher levels of education, so that the OR of breast cancer in women with primary and secondary schooling was 2.2 in comparison to illiterate women (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2 to 4.0) and the OR for women with university education was 2.8 in comparison to illiterate women (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.3 to 5.9).
- In the univariate analysis, breast cancer risk decreased with increasing fruit consumption, and in the univariate and multivariate analyses, breast cancer risk decreased with increasing vegetable consumption. Therefore, the OR of breast cancer associated with consumption of 2-3 servings of vegetables per month was 2.8 in comparison to daily consumption (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.7 to 4.5).
- The OR of breast cancer in women who consumed soft drinks (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.9 to 4.3), industrially produced juices (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 6.5) and solid oils (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.0) more than once a month was significantly elevated relative to their counterparts who did not consume those substances or did so no more than once a month.
- The most powerful risk factor for breast cancer in the univariate and multivariate analyses was fried foods, even though the magnitude of this relationship decreased after controlling for other variables. The OR of breast cancer in women consuming fried foods more than once a month was 4.5 in comparison to women who consumed fried foods never or once a month (95% CI, 2.1 to 9.4).
- A significant relationship was found between sweets consumption and the odds of breast cancer. The OR of breast cancer in women who consumed sweets more than a month was 2.6 in comparison with women whose sweets consumption was in the favorable range (95% CI, 1.7 to 3.9) (Table 2).
- After controlling for demographic variables, including age, education level, and BMI, a non-linear relationship was found between the odds of breast cancer and consumption of food materials. In particular, the consumption of fast foods and soft drinks increased the odds of breast cancer (Figure 2).
- The relationship of fruit and vegetable consumption with breast cancer was analyzed using the same model. The odds of breast cancer decreased as fruit and vegetable consumption increased to 90 units per month, but increased at higher levels of consumption (Figure 3).
RESULTS
- The risk of breast cancer was found to be higher in women who consumed soft drinks more than once a month than in those who did not consume soft drinks or did so once a month. It has been previously reported that the consumption of soft drinks significantly increases the odds of breast cancer. Soft drinks, since they are calorically dense, lead to increases in BMI, obesity, and insulin resistance, which are mediators of cancer risk [11,15]. The dose-response pattern indicated that consuming soft drinks more than 12 times a month increased the odds of breast cancer. However, the odds of having breast cancer in women who consumed soft drinks 10-12 times per month was even lower than in those who never consumed soft drinks. This may have been because of other unassessed chronic diseases or because of a possible preventive role of consuming small amounts of soft drinks, similar to the effect that has been observed for alcohol. Further studies are needed to clarify the underlying causality.
- In a meta-analysis of 55 articles, Boyle et al. [16] assessed the relationship between soft drink consumption and various cancers, including breast cancer, and concluded that consumption of various levels of soft drinks did not increase the risk of the studied cancers. A reason for this may have been the concomitant consumption of high-fat foods along with soft drinks.
- Dong et al. [17], in a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies, assessed the relationship between dairy consumption and risk of breast cancer. They reported that the odds of breast cancer decreased with increasing dairy consumption. The current study found that after controlling for confounding variables, there was no significant relationship between dairy consumption and the odds of breast cancer. However, according to the dose-response pattern, the odds of breast cancer decreased with increasing dairy consumption. Differences in the fat composition of dairy products in different studies may account for discrepancies in the results across studies, as it has been reported that the consumption of low-fat dairy products decreases the odds of breast cancer and vice versa [12]. Farvid et al. [18] indicated that high-fat dairy products increased the risk of estrogen and progesterone receptor negative tumors.
- On the basis of the dose-response graph, although the odds of breast cancer increased with the frequency of fast food consumption, the relationship was not significant. The odds of breast cancer associated with consuming fast foods more than 15 times a month showed high variation and a wide confidence interval, which may have been because of the low sample size. Therefore, it did not show statistical significance. Michels et al. [19], in a study of 89,887 women, concluded that this relationship was significant. Regarding the cause, they have reported that sodium nitrate in processed meats, such as sausage, burgers, and pizza, is converted to nitrosamine, which is a known carcinogen. Researchers from Poland have reported that the odds of breast cancer increased 3 times with daily consumption of fast foods [20].
- The most important result of the current study is the highly significant relationship found between consumption of fried foods and the odds of breast cancer, as the odds of breast cancer in women who frequently consumed fried foods were 4.5 times higher than among their counterparts. A study by Agurs-Collins et al. [21] regarding dietary patterns and breast cancer risk in women reported similar findings. In this regard, it is necessary to perform studies on the methods of frying, the types of fried foods, the temperature used in frying, and the duration of frying. Because more than half of the participants in this study consumed solid and semi-solid fats, the effect of fried food on breast cancer in this study was higher than in another similar study [22].
- The results indicated that the odds of breast cancer in women who consumed unfavorable fats more than once a month (solid, semi-solid, and animal fats, or a mixture of liquid and solid fats) was higher than women who consumed such fats never or once a month. Holmes & Willett [23] reported that animal fat consumption was linked to the risk of breast tumors. However, Sieri et al. [24] did not report a significant relationship between fat consumption and the risk of breast cancer. It can be concluded that the consumption of different types of fats and oils have different effects on the odds of breast cancer [25].
- The dose-response pattern indicated that more frequent sweets consumption increased the odds of breast cancer, with a steep slope. Of note, in a study conducted in Australia, Harray et al. [26] found that people who paid more attention to their health situation consumed smaller amounts of junk foods.
- A significant direct relationship was found between the odds of breast cancer and education level. Other studies confirm this result [27,28]. However, other studies have reported an opposite pattern. For example, education level was proposed as a protective factor in an Indian study. The authors of that study stated that the effects of confounding factors such as socioeconomic status explained the protective effect of education, as higher levels of education indirectly affect dietary patterns [29,30].
- The consumption of vegetables is recommend because of their antioxidant properties. An inverse relationship was found between vegetable consumption and the odds of breast cancer. In other words, the odds of breast cancer increased as vegetable consumption decreased. For example, the odds of breast cancer increased when vegetable consumption decreased from daily consumption to weekly or monthly consumption. Boffetta et al. [31] obtained similar results in a study that aimed to compare fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cancer among the European Union countries. In the present study, the analysis of the dose-response pattern indicated that the odds of breast cancer decreased as fruit and vegetable consumption increased to 90 servings per month, but then increased with higher levels of consumption. This may have been caused by other factors, such as an increased caloric intake, exceeding the body’s requirements.
- No significant relationship was found between the odds of breast cancer and place of residence. In this regard, previous studies have indicated that differences in the risk of breast cancer according to place of residence are more likely to stem from differences in diet patterns and personal habits than from environmental factors. Additionally, as the lifestyle of people living in rural and urban regions has become more similar, it is expected that differences in the rate of breast cancer between rural and urban regions will decrease in the future [32].
- No significant relationship was found between the odds of breast cancer and marital status. However, international studies have indicated that single women have a higher risk of breast cancer than married women. Overall, on one hand, it might seem that married, divorced, and widowed women have no inherent differences in their risk of breast cancer compared with single women, and that the apparent protective effect of marriage may be because of the age of their first pregnancy and childbirth. Additionally, older age at marriage leads to delays in the first pregnancy and childbirth, which are a risk factor for breast cancer. On the other hand, single women less frequently visit doctors, which may lead to late diagnosis and treatment [6,33].
- BMI is known to affect the risk of breast cancer, but no significant relationship was found in the current study. This is in accordance with the study of Alim & Kiziltan [10], but Galukande et al. [32] reported an inverse relationship between BMI and the probability of breast cancer; however, this may have been because of weight loss in the case group in the time before the disease being diagnosed. Many studies have reported a positive and significant relationship between obesity and high BMI with breast cancer risk. Estrogen release from fat cells has been proposed as the cause for this relationship [34,35]. After the teenage years, the risk of breast cancer increases with BMI; therefore, maintaining one’s weight in the normal range is necessary to prevent breast cancer [36].
- Age is known to be the most important and challenging risk factor for breast cancer, as the risk of breast cancer dramatically increases with age [37]. The current study likewise indicated that there was a significant and direct relationship between increasing age and the odds of breast cancer. However, based on the conflicting results of studies of the prognosis of breast cancer in young women [38].
- Although this study has some limitations, such as not assessing other risk factors such as hormonal medications, the sensitivity and specificity of the logistic model are indicative of the adequacy of the model and the studied variables. Another limitation is the method of measuring nutrition status; although the validity and reliability of the questionnaire have been confirmed, it is known that responses to nutrition questions include both over-reporting and under-reporting. Trained interviewers who were thoroughly familiar with the nutrition questionnaire were used to decrease this type of error. We sought to minimize the inherent risk of bias associated with case-control studies by assessing the treatment history and 2-year follow-up of the control group.
- In summary, increasing age, higher education levels, inadequate consumption of vegetables, and consumption of soft drinks, industrially produced juices, fried foods, and sweets were identified as risk factors for breast cancer among women under 50. Therefore, it is essential to raise awareness and to disseminate education about a healthy diet and how to change unhealthy dietary patterns. Certain risk factors, such as BMI, place of residence, lack of daily consumption of dairy products and fruits, and consumption of salt and fast foods were not found to be related with the risk of breast cancer in this study, but have been in other studies, suggesting that it is necessary to assess these factors in greater depth.
- The main measures to strengthen cultural support for consuming a healthy diet that would reduce the risk of breast cancer include acceptance of responsibility by political leaders from the capital to the most remote villages and funding initiatives that promote healthy dietary patterns. More local measures include carrying out national and subnational campaigns such as public walking initiatives; educational sessions; designing brochures, posters and banners and distributing them in cities and villages; and showing appreciation for the healthcare workers who are active in this regard.
DISCUSSION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Figure 2.Dose-response relationships of (A) fast food, (B) fried foods, (C) sweets, and (D) soft drinks in terms of the frequency of consumption per month with the odds of breast cancer based on fractional polynomials adjusted for demographic variables including age, gender, education level, and body mass index.
Figure 3. The odds of breast cancer associated with the consumption of (A) dairy products, (B) fats and oils, (C) vegetables, and (D) fruits in terms of the frequency of consumption per month.
Table 1.Measurements of servings and definitions of favorable amounts of consumption of food materials
Table 2.Univariate and multivariate analysis of dietary patterns and risk of breast cancer
- 1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65:87-108.ArticlePubMed
- 2. Roohparvarzade N. Prevalence of risk factors for breast cancer in women (20 to 69 years old) in Isfahan 2012-2013. Iran J Breast Dis 2014;7:52-61. (Persian).
- 3. DeSantis C, Siegel R, Bandi P, Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics, 2011. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:409-418.ArticlePubMed
- 4. Walker RA, Lees E, Webb MB, Dearing SJ. Breast carcinomas occurring in young women (<35 years) are different. Br J Cancer 1996;74:1796-1800.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
- 5. Motie MR, Besharat S, Torkjazi R, Shojaa M, Besharat M, Keshtkar A, et al. Modifiable risk of breast cancer in northeast iran: hope for the future. a case-control study. Breast Care (Basel) 2011;6:453-456.ArticlePubMedPMC
- 6. Tehranian N, Shobeiri F, Pour FH, Hagizadeh E. Risk factors for breast cancer in Iranian women aged less than 40 years. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2010;11:1723-1725.PubMed
- 7. Mousavi SM, Montazeri A, Mohagheghi MA, Jarrahi AM, Harirchi I, Najafi M, et al. Breast cancer in Iran: an epidemiological review. Breast J 2007;13:383-391.ArticlePubMed
- 8. Kelsey JL, Berkowitz GS. Breast cancer epidemiology. Cancer Res 1988;48:5615-5623.ArticlePubMed
- 9. Kotepui M. Diet and risk of breast cancer. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2016;20:13-19.ArticlePubMedPMC
- 10. Alim NE, Kiziltan G. Assessment of risk factors of obesity and diet on breast cancer in Ankara, Turkey. Pak J Med Sci 2016;32:1537-1542.ArticlePubMedPMC
- 11. Brennan SF, Cantwell MM, Cardwell CR, Velentzis LS, Woodside JV. Dietary patterns and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 2010;91:1294-1302.ArticlePubMedPDF
- 12. Kojima R, Okada E, Ukawa S, Mori M, Wakai K, Date C, et al. Dietary patterns and breast cancer risk in a prospective Japanese study. Breast Cancer 2017;24152-160.ArticlePDF
- 13. Butler LM, Wu AH, Wang R, Koh WP, Yuan JM, Yu MC. A vegetable-fruit-soy dietary pattern protects against breast cancer among postmenopausal Singapore Chinese women. Am J Clin Nutr 2010;91:1013-1019.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
- 14. Allameh M, Farahani A, Tabatabaee M. Integrated care guidelines for middle aged health in Iran; 2016 [cited 2019 Feb 20]. Available from: http://www.behdasht.gov.ir/(Persian)
- 15. Lim S, Zoellner JM, Lee JM, Burt BA, Sandretto AM, Sohn W, et al. Obesity and sugar-sweetened beverages in African-American preschool children: a longitudinal study. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009;17:1262-1268.ArticlePubMed
- 16. Boyle P, Koechlin A, Autier P. Sweetened carbonated beverage consumption and cancer risk: meta-analysis and review. Eur J Cancer Prev 2014;23:481-490.ArticlePubMed
- 17. Dong JY, Zhang L, He K, Qin LQ. Dairy consumption and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011;127:23-31.ArticlePubMedPDF
- 18. Farvid MS, Eliassen AH, Cho E, Chen WY, Willett WC. Dairy consumption in adolescence and early adulthood and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27:575-584.ArticlePubMedPMC
- 19. Michels KB, Willett WC, Rosner BA, Manson JE, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA, et al. Prospective assessment of breastfeeding and breast cancer incidence among 89,887 women. Lancet 1996;347:431-436.ArticlePubMed
- 20. Plagens-Rotman K, Piskorz-Szymendera M, Chmaj-Wierzychowska K, Pieta B. Breast cancer - analysis of the selected risk factors. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2017;38:425-430.PubMed
- 21. Agurs-Collins T, Rosenberg L, Makambi K, Palmer JR, Adams-Campbell L. Dietary patterns and breast cancer risk in women participating in the Black Women’s Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;90:621-628.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
- 22. Bahrami G, Bahrami S, Bahrami MT, Pasdar Y, Rezaei M, Darbandi M. The trans fatty acid content of snacks offered in Kermanshah. Int J Health Life Sci 2015;1:17-23.
- 23. Holmes MD, Willett WC. Does diet affect breast cancer risk? Breast Cancer Res 2004;6:170-178.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
- 24. Sieri S, Krogh V, Ferrari P, Berrino F, Pala V, Thiébaut AC, et al. Dietary fat and breast cancer risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr 2008;88:1304-1312.PubMed
- 25. Thiébaut AC, Chajès V, Gerber M, Boutron-Ruault MC, Joulin V, Lenoir G, et al. Dietary intakes of omega-6 and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and the risk of breast cancer. Int J Cancer 2009;124:924-931.ArticlePubMed
- 26. Harray AJ, Boushey CJ, Pollard CM, Panizza CE, Delp EJ, Dhaliwal SS, et al. Perception v. actual intakes of junk food and sugar-sweetened beverages in Australian young adults: assessed using the mobile food record. Public Health Nutr 2017;20:2300-2307.ArticlePubMedPMC
- 27. Kamath R, Mahajan KS, Ashok L, Sanal TS. A study on risk factors of breast cancer among patients attending the tertiary care hospital, in udupi district. Indian J Community Med 2013;38:95-99.ArticlePubMedPMC
- 28. Naieni KH, Ardalan A, Mahmoodi M, Motevalian A, Yahyapoor Y, Yazdizadeh B. Risk factors of breast cancer in north of Iran: a case-control in Mazandaran Province. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2007;8:395-398.PubMed
- 29. Besharat S, Motie MR, Besharat M, Roshandel G. Breast cancer risk factors in women of Golestan Province in Iran: a case-control study. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 2011;13:46-51. (Persian).
- 30. Das S, Sen S, Mukherjee A, Chakraborty D, Mondal PK. Risk factors of breast cancer among women in eastern India: a tertiary hospital based case control study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2012;13:4979-4981.ArticlePubMedPDF
- 31. Boffetta P, Couto E, Wichmann J, Ferrari P, Trichopoulos D, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, et al. Fruit and vegetable intake and overall cancer risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102:529-537.ArticlePubMedPDF
- 32. Galukande M, Wabinga H, Mirembe F, Karamagi C, Asea A. Breast cancer risk factors among Ugandan women at a tertiary hospital: a case-control study. Oncology 2016;90:356-362.ArticlePubMedPMC
- 33. Ebrahimi M, Vahdaninia M, Montazeri A. Risk factors for breast cancer in Iran: a case-control study. Breast Cancer Res 2002;4:R10.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
- 34. Protani M, Coory M, Martin JH. Effect of obesity on survival of women with breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010;123:627-635.ArticlePubMedPDF
- 35. Goodwin PJ, Stambolic V. Impact of the obesity epidemic on cancer. Annu Rev Med 2015;66:281-296.ArticlePubMed
- 36. Hsieh CC, Trichopoulos D, Katsouyanni K, Yuasa S. Age at menarche, age at menopause, height and obesity as risk factors for breast cancer: associations and interactions in an international case-control study. Int J Cancer 1990;46:796-800.ArticlePubMed
- 37. Montero JC, Ocaña A, Abad M, Ortiz-Ruiz MJ, Pandiella A, Esparís-Ogando A. Expression of Erk5 in early stage breast cancer and association with disease free survival identifies this kinase as a potential therapeutic target. PLoS One 2009;4:e5565.ArticlePubMedPMC
- 38. Colleoni M, Rotmensz N, Robertson C, Orlando L, Viale G, Renne G, et al. Very young women (<35 years) with operable breast cancer: features of disease at presentation. Ann Oncol 2002;13:273-279.ArticlePDF
REFERENCES
Figure & Data
References
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by 
- Prevalence of Risk Factors for Breast Cancer among Women Aged More Than 30 Years in Rural Delhi, India
Sunom M. Lepcha, Anita Khokhar
Preventive Medicine: Research & Reviews.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Unveiling the spice of life: Exploring the impact of spicy food consumption on breast cancer risk through a comparative study
Leni Merdawati, Wei-Shan Chin, Reni Prima Gusty, Hui-Chuan Huang
Electronic Journal of General Medicine.2025; 22(2): em637. CrossRef - Associations Between Dietary Factors and Breast Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review of Evidence from the MENA Region
Najoua Lamchabbek, Chaimaa Elattabi, Abdellatif Bour, Bernadette Chimera, Saber Boutayeb, Lahcen Belyamani, Elodie Faure, Inge Huybrechts, Mohamed Khalis
Nutrients.2025; 17(3): 394. CrossRef - Analysis of oral cancer carcinogens in repeatedly heated cooking oils
Vidhant Krishna Nambiar, Vidya Mudliar, Inosi Salababa
Heliyon.2025; 11(2): e41858. CrossRef - Dietary Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, Sugar, and Fiber Intake in Association With Breast Cancer Risk: An Updated Meta-analysis
Hugo Pomares-Millan, Solange M Saxby, Sham Al-Mashadi Dahl, Margaret R Karagas, Michael N Passarelli
Nutrition Reviews.2025; 83(7): 1171. CrossRef - Nutritional knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding prevention of breast cancer among the female population of Surat district
Pruthvi Parekh, Arti Muley, Srujana Medithi
Discover Social Science and Health.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Dietary patterns, cooking methods and breast cancer risk in Mexico: An exploratory case-control study
Elisa Pineda, María I. Ortega-Vélez, Martin Preciado-Rodríguez, Socorro Saucedo-Tamayo, Graciela Caire-Juvera
Nutrition and Health.2024; 30(2): 349. CrossRef - Association of microRNA-21 expression with breast cancer subtypes and its potential as an early biomarker
Sau Har Lee, Brianna
Pathology - Research and Practice.2024; 254: 155073. CrossRef - Modifiable risk factors for cancer in the middle East and North Africa: a scoping review
Razan Mansour, Abdallah Al-Ani, Maysa Al-Hussaini, Hikmat Abdel-Razeq, Akram Al-Ibraheem, Asem H. Mansour
BMC Public Health.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - The impact of BMI on breast cancer – an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Nikolaos Tzenios, Mary E. Tazanios, Mohamed Chahine
Medicine.2024; 103(5): e36831. CrossRef - Eating behaviors and physical activity during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown: Experiences of breast cancer patients on adjuvant hormonal therapy
Marija Paunovic, Danijela Ristic-Medic, Aleksandra Arsic, Snjezana Petrovic, Predrag Krstic, Milica Kojadinovic, Vesna Vucic
Vojnosanitetski pregled.2024; 81(5): 279. CrossRef - Assessing nutrition-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards breast cancer prevention among female students at the Federal University of Oye-Ekiti, Nigeria
Ibiwumi Damaris Kolawole, Oni Kunle, Kayode Ajayi, Thomas Prates Ong
Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - The effect of BMI on survival outcome of breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Yu-huan Kong, Jing-yi Huang, Ye Ding, Shu-hua Chen, Qiu-shuang Li, Yang Xiong
Clinical and Translational Oncology.2024; 27(2): 403. CrossRef - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Lifestyle and Reproductive Factors Associated with Risk of Breast Cancer in Asian Women
Boon Hong Ang, Soo-Hwang Teo, Weang-Kee Ho
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.2024; 33(10): 1273. CrossRef - Association between empirically derived nutrient patterns and breast cancer: a case–control study in a Middle Eastern country
Farimah Dehghani, Bahareh Sasanfar, Fatemeh Toorang, Kazem Zendehdel, Amin Salehi-Abargouei
BMC Nutrition.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Associations of the Healthy Beverage Index (HBI) and the risk of Breast Cancer (BrCa): a case–control study
Navideh Khodadadi, Mohammad Hassan Sohouli, Mojtaba Ghadiani, Hamid Rezvani, Mahdi Tabarraee, Hamid Reza Ahadi, Sina Salari, Hamide Rahmani Seraji
BMC Women's Health.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Association of food groups and dietary pattern with breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Sangah Shin, Jialei Fu, Woo-Kyoung Shin, Dan Huang, Sukhong Min, Daehee Kang
Clinical Nutrition.2023; 42(3): 282. CrossRef - Dietary patterns and breast cancer risk, prognosis, and quality of life: A systematic review
Yuan Bu, Junchao Qu, Siqi Ji, Jingxin Zhou, Mengxin Xue, Jiling Qu, Huiping Sun, Yongbing Liu
Frontiers in Nutrition.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Dietary Heat-Treatment Contaminants Exposure and Cancer: A Case Study from Turkey
Hilal Pekmezci, Burhan Basaran
Foods.2023; 12(12): 2320. CrossRef - The importance of SOCS1 − 1478 CA/del polymorphism and expression in breast cancer: a case–control study in the north of Iran
Habibbullah Paeiz, Zivar Salehi, Farhad Mashayekhi, Hamid Saeidi Saedi, Laleh Mirzanejad
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2023; 202(2): 389. CrossRef - Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester (CAPE) Synergistically Enhances Paclitaxel Activity in Ovarian Cancer Cells
Anna Kleczka, Radosław Dzik, Agata Kabała-Dzik
Molecules.2023; 28(15): 5813. CrossRef - Investigation of Breast Cancer Risk Factors in the Imam Hossein and Shohada-E Tajrish Hospitals of Tehran in 2019–2022: A case–control study
Hanieh Bayat, Sima Nazarpour, Robab Anbiaee
SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Menopoz-Sonrası Dönemde Meme Kanseri Gelişiminde Beslenme Alışkanlıkları ve Yaşam Kalitesi Etkili mi?
Burçak ÇUBUKÇU, Fatma TAYHAN KARTAL, Gözde EDE
Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi.2023; 12(3): 1301. CrossRef - A clinical-radiomics nomogram based on multimodal ultrasound for predicting the malignancy risk in solid hypoechoic breast lesions
Guo Shiyan, Jiang Liqing, Yan Yueqiong, Zhang Yan
Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Current status and prospect of ZIF-based materials for breast cancer treatment
Yana Zeng, Donghui Liao, Xiangyang Kong, Qianying Huang, Muyi Zhong, Jianqiang Liu, Alireza Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh, Ying Pan, Hailiang Song
Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces.2023; 232: 113612. CrossRef - Effect of vitamin D supplementation on inflammatory markers and total antioxidant capacity in breast cancer women using a machine learning technique
Marzieh Tahmasebi, Masoud Veissi, Seyed Ahmad Hosseini, Amir Jamshidnezhad
Exploration of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy.2023; : 1059. CrossRef - Dietary pattern and other factors of breast cancer among women: a case control study in Northwest Ethiopia
Hiwot Fentie, Peter Austin Morton Ntenda, Fentanesh Nibret Tiruneh
BMC Cancer.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Exploring the geospatial epidemiology of breast cancer in Iran: identifying significant risk factors and spatial patterns for evidence-based prevention strategies
Mohsen Soleimani, Seyed Mohammad Ayyoubzadeh, Ahmad Jalilvand, Marjan Ghazisaeedi
BMC Cancer.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - The Application of Whole-Process Case Management in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Yunyan Zhao, Ran Zhu, Jie Bai, Jie Li, Xue Jia, Peng Wang, Lijun Jin, Wei long Zhong
Journal of Oncology.2022; 2022: 1. CrossRef - Age-specific incidence rates of breast cancer among Japanese women increasing in a conspicuous bimodal distribution pattern
Nanami Tokutake, Riona Ushiyama, Kyoka Matsubayashi, Yuji Aoki
Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare.2021; 30(2): 166. CrossRef - Consumption of Sweet Beverages and Cancer Risk. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
Fjorida Llaha, Mercedes Gil-Lespinard, Pelin Unal, Izar de Villasante, Jazmín Castañeda, Raul Zamora-Ros
Nutrients.2021; 13(2): 516. CrossRef - The association between plant-based dietary patterns and risk of breast cancer: a case–control study
Somaye Rigi, Seyed Mohammad Mousavi, Sanaz Benisi-Kohansal, Leila Azadbakht, Ahmad Esmaillzadeh
Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - Preventive measures against development of breast cancer
Yu. V. Vykhristyuk, G. E. Roitberg, J. V. Dorosh, N. V. Karaseva, R. A. Akobova
South Russian Journal of Cancer.2021; 2(1): 50. CrossRef - Association between dietary phytochemical index and breast cancer: a case–control study
Seyed Mojtaba Ghoreishy, Azadeh Aminianfar, Sanaz Benisi-Kohansal, Leila Azadbakht, Ahmad Esmaillzadeh
Breast Cancer.2021; 28(6): 1283. CrossRef - The Benefit of Enhanced Daycare of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Cancer Treatment Related Adverse Events: A Retrospective Study of Medical Records
Hsiu-An Wu, Chien-Hung Chen, Ming-Hsien Hsieh, Yung-Chang Wu, Jung-Peng Chiu, Chien-Jung Huang, Chung-Hua Hsu
Integrative Cancer Therapies.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - Differential effects of phenolic extracts from red‐fleshed apple peels and flesh induced G1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human breast cancer MDA‐MB‐231 cells
Cui Xia Li, Zhen Xian Lin, Xian Hua Zhao, Wei Fang Zuo, Nan Wang, Zong Ying Zhang, Xue Sen Chen
Journal of Food Science.2021; 86(9): 4209. CrossRef - Evaluation of the Effects of Different Dietary Patterns on Breast Cancer: Monitoring Circulating Tumor Cells
Xiuxiu Wang, Xiaoyu Liu, Zhenzhen Jia, Yilun Zhang, Shuo Wang, Hongyan Zhang
Foods.2021; 10(9): 2223. CrossRef - The association between adherence to MIND diet and risk of breast cancer: A case–control study
Fatemeh Sheikhhossein, Hossein Imani, Mohammad Reza Amini, Fatemeh Hosseini, Sakineh Shab‐Bidar
International Journal of Clinical Practice.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - Factors affecting health services strategic purchasing for breast cancer patients: a mixed study in Iran
Samereh Yaghoubian, Mohammad Ali Jahani, Zeynab Farhadi, Ghahraman Mahmoudi
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - Effect of Consumption of Whole-Wheat Breads on FBS, HbA1c, and Blood Lipids in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
Javad Nazari, Nasrin Yadegari, Sousan Khodam, Amir Almasi-Hashian, Saeed Amini
Preventive Nutrition and Food Science.2021; 26(3): 269. CrossRef - Dietary Patterns and Risk of Invasive Ductal and Lobular Breast Carcinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Mostafa Dianatinasab, Marjan Rezaian, Elmira HaghighatNezad, Zahra Bagheri-Hosseinabadi, Sasan Amanat, Shahab Rezaeian, Alireza Masoudi, Reza Ghiasvand
Clinical Breast Cancer.2020; 20(4): e516. CrossRef - Preprocessing Breast Cancer Data to Improve the Data Quality, Diagnosis Procedure, and Medical Care Services
Zeinab Sajjadnia, Raof Khayami, Mohammad Reza Moosavi
Cancer Informatics.2020;[Epub] CrossRef - Breast cancer risk factors in Iran: a systematic review & meta-analysis
Amir Shamshirian, Keyvan Heydari, Zahra Shams, Amir Reza Aref, Danial Shamshirian, Omid Reza Tamtaji, Zatollah Asemi, Layla Shojaie, Hamed Mirzaei, Neda Mohammadi, Behdad Zibaee, Keyvan Karimifar, Bahman Zarandi, Akbar Hedayatizadeh-Omran, Reza Alizadeh-N
Hormone Molecular Biology and Clinical Investigation.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
PubReader
ePub Link
Cite
XML DownloadDietary patterns, nutrition, and risk of breast cancer: a case-control study in the west of Iran
Figure 1. Flowchart of the research process.
Figure 2. Dose-response relationships of (A) fast food, (B) fried foods, (C) sweets, and (D) soft drinks in terms of the frequency of consumption per month with the odds of breast cancer based on fractional polynomials adjusted for demographic variables including age, gender, education level, and body mass index.
Figure 3. The odds of breast cancer associated with the consumption of (A) dairy products, (B) fats and oils, (C) vegetables, and (D) fruits in terms of the frequency of consumption per month.
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Dietary patterns, nutrition, and risk of breast cancer: a case-control study in the west of Iran
| Food material | Amount of each serving | Favorable amount (recom- mended consumption) |
|---|---|---|
| Dairy | A cup of milk or yogurt = 45 to 60 g of typical cheese (one ounce) = one-fourth of a cup of whey = 2 cups of dough (Iranian drink)= one and a half cups of vanilla ice cream | 2-3 serving/d |
| Vegetables | A cup of raw leafy vegetables = half a cup of cooked or raw chopped vegetables = half a cup of starchy vegetables (green peas, beans, corn, green beans and carrots) = a medium- sized tomato; carrots; cucumbers; raw onions | 3-5 serving/d |
| Fruits | (A medium-sized) apple, banana, orange, pear, peach, kiwi, nectarine = half a cup of small fruits such as berries, grapes and pomegranates = 2 tangerines = half of a grapefruit = 12 cherries = 2 plums or dates or fresh figs = 4 medium-sized apricots = 300 grams of differ- ent melons = half a cup of cooked fruit or a compote = one-fourth of a cup of dried fruit or nuts = three-quarters of a cup of fresh and natural juice | 2-4 serving/d |
| Fast food | Sausage; pizza; fast food; Mexican corn; fried potatoes; salty, smoked and canned meat | Never or once a month |
| Soft drinks | Carbonated drinks (cola, various drinks, non-alcoholic beer) | Never or once a month |
| Industrially produced juices | Various industrially produced juices | Never or once a month |
| Fats and oils | Solid, semi-solid, or animal fat or a mixture of liquid or solid fat | Never or once a month |
| Salt | Use of table salt from a salt shaker | Never or once a month |
| Fried foods | Fried with high fat | Never or once a month |
| Sweets | Various sweets, chocolate, and sugar | Never or once a month |
| Low-nutritional-value snacks | Chips, puffs | Never or once a month |
| Variable | Case/control | Crude OR (95% CI) | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | ≤30 | 14/69 | 1.0 (reference) | 1.0 (reference) |
| 31-40 | 70/146 | 2.4 (1.2, 4.5) | - | |
| 41-50 | 128/193 | 3.3 (1.7, 6.0) | - | |
| Education | Illiterate | 28/78 | 1.0 (reference) | 1.0 (reference) |
| Less than a high school diploma | 107/167 | 1.7 (1.0, 2.9) | 2.2 (1.2, 4.0) | |
| High school diploma | 41/79 | 1.4 (0.8, 2.5) | 2.2 (1.1, 4.5) | |
| College/university | 36/84 | 1.9 (0.6, 2.1) | 2.8 (1.3, 5.9) | |
| Location | Urban | 170/349 | 1.0 (reference) | - |
| Rural | 42/59 | 1.4 (0.9, 2.2) | - | |
| Marital status | Married | 175/332 | 1.0 (reference) | - |
| Single | 27/56 | 0.9 (0.5, 1.4) | - | |
| Separated/divorced/widowed | 10/20 | 0.9 (0.4, 2.0) | - | |
| Job | Housekeeper | 184/355 | 1.0 (reference) | - |
| Government employee | 16/33 | 0.9 (0.5, 1.7) | - | |
| Private-sector employee | 12/20 | 1.1 (0.5, 2.4) | - | |
| Insurance coverage | Yes | 207/400 | 1.0 (reference) | - |
| No | 5/8 | 1.2 (0.3, 3.7) | - | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | <24.9 | 63/140 | 1.0 (reference) | - |
| 24.9-29.9 | 99/166 | 1.3 (0.8, 1.9) | - | |
| 29.9-34.9 | 35/84 | 0.9 (0.5, 1.5) | - | |
| >34.9 | 15/18 | 1.8 (0.8, 3.9) | - | |
| Dairy consumption | Daily | 114/275 | 1.0 (reference) | - |
| 2-3 serving/wk | 43/50 | 2.0 (1.3, 3.2) | - | |
| 2-3 serving/mo | 55/83 | 1.5 (1.0, 2.3) | - | |
| Consumption of vegetables | Daily | 52/191 | 1.0 (reference) | 1.0 (reference) |
| 2-3 serving/wk | 58//85 | 2.5 (1.5, 3.9) | 1.7 (1.0, 2.9) | |
| 2-3 serving/mo | 102/132 | 2.8 (1.9, 4.2) | 2.8 (1.7, 4.5) | |
| Consumption of fruits | Daily | 133/317 | 1.0 (reference) | - |
| 2-3 serving/wk | 56/57 | 2.3 (1.5, 3.5) | - | |
| 2-3 serving/mo | 23/34 | 1.6 (0.9, 2.8) | - | |
| Fast food | Favorable | 43/38 | 1.0 (reference) | - |
| Unfavorable | 169/370 | 2.4 (1.5, 3.9) | - | |
| Soft drinks | Favorable | 127/113 | 1.0 (reference) | 1.0 (reference) |
| Unfavorable | 85/295 | 3.9 (2.7, 5.5) | 2.8 (1.9, 4.3) | |
| Industrially produced juices | Favorable | 19/12 | 1.0 (reference) | 1.0 (reference) |
| Unfavorable | 193/396 | 3.2 (1.5, 6.8) | 2.7 (1.1, 6.5) | |
| Fats and oils | Favorable | 151/220 | 1.0 (reference) | 1.0 (reference) |
| Unfavorable | 61/188 | 2.1 (1.4, 3.0) | 1.9 (1.3, 3.0) | |
| Salt | Favorable | 130/227 | 1.0 (reference) | - |
| Unfavorable | 82/181 | 1.2 (0.9, 1.7) | - | |
| Fried foods | Favorable | 202/288 | 1.0 (reference) | 1.0 (reference) |
| Unfavorable | 10/120 | 8.4 (4.3, 16.4) | 4.5 (2.1, 9.4) | |
| Sweets | Favorable | 117/101 | 1.0 (reference) | - |
| Unfavorable | 94/307 | 3.7 (2.6, 5.3) | 2.6 (1.7, 3.9) | |
| Low-nutritional-value snacks | Favorable | 36/27 | 1.0 (reference) | - |
| Unfavorable | 176/381 | 2.8 (1.6, 4.9) | - | |
| Goodness of fit model | ||||
| Sensitivity | 55.9 | |||
| Specificity | 86.8 | |||
| Accuracy | 76.3 |
Table 1. Measurements of servings and definitions of favorable amounts of consumption of food materials
Table 2. Univariate and multivariate analysis of dietary patterns and risk of breast cancer
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
