An overview of systematic reviews of diagnostic tests accuracy
Jong-Myon Bae
Epidemiol Health. 2014;36(0):e2014016  Published online 2014 Aug 29     DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih/e2014016
Citations to this article as recorded by Crossref logo
Meta‐analysis of the accuracy of p16 or p16/Ki‐67 immunocytochemistry versus HPV testing for the detection of CIN2+/CIN3+ in triage of women with minor abnormal cytology
Eliana Peeters, Nicolas Wentzensen, Christine Bergeron, Marc Arbyn
Cancer Cytopathology.2019; 127(3): 169.     CrossRef
Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide for the Diagnosis of Childhood Asthma: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Songqi Tang, Yiqiang Xie, Conghu Yuan, Xiaoming Sun, Yubao Cui
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology.2019; 56(2): 129.     CrossRef
Health effects from exposure to dental diagnostic X-ray
Su-Yeon Hwang, Eun-Sil Choi, Young-Sun Kim, Bo-Eun Gim, Mina Ha, Hae-Young Kim
Environmental Health and Toxicology.2018; 33(4): e2018017.     CrossRef
Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography for identification of ischemic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Wen Wu, Dao-Rong Pan, Nicolas Foin, Si Pang, Peng Ye, Niels Holm, Xiao-Min Ren, Jie Luo, Aravinda Nanjundappa, Shao-Liang Chen
Scientific Reports.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
Meta-Epidemiology
Jong-Myon Bae
Epidemiology and Health.2014; : e2014019.     CrossRef