Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Epidemiol Health : Epidemiology and Health

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
7 "Guideline"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Article
Adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research and Korean Cancer Prevention Guidelines and cancer risk: a prospective cohort study from the Health Examinees-Gem study
Jeeyoo Lee, Aesun Shin, Woo-Kyoung Shin, Ji-Yeob Choi, Daehee Kang, Jong-Koo Lee
Epidemiol Health. 2023;45:e2023070.   Published online August 1, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2023070
  • 3,979 View
  • 181 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
AbstractAbstract AbstractSummary PDFSupplementary Material
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to explore the association between adherence to 2 cancer prevention recommendations and cancer risk.
METHODS
In total, 104,386 individuals aged 40-69 years old who were recruited between 2004 and 2013 in the Health Examinees-Gem study were included. Adherence scores were constructed based on 8 items from the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) cancer prevention recommendations, including body weight, physical activity, diet, alcohol consumption and breastfeeding, and on 6 items from the Korean cancer prevention guidelines (smoking status, eating vegetables and fruits, salty foods, alcohol intake, physical activity, and body weight). A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the associations between adherence scores and the risk of total and 5 major cancers.
RESULTS
The multivariable hazard ratio (HR) for total cancer with the high adherence score versus the lowest score (4.25-7.00 vs. 0.00-3.25) for the WCRF/AICR guidelines was 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 1.00) in men. A reduced breast cancer risk was observed among women with the highest score. Men within the highest category of the Korean cancer prevention guideline score (3.25-6.00) had an HR of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.88) for developing total cancer compared to men within the lowest score (0.00-2.50). The higher adherence group among men showed lower risks of developing stomach, colorectal, and lung cancers.
CONCLUSIONS
Adhering to guidelines for cancer prevention can help to reduce the risk of developing cancer in Korean men. The association might differ by cancer type and gender.
Summary
Korean summary
- 암예방 가이드라인 준수가 실제로 암 발생을 예방하는지에 대한 해외 연구들이 다수 있으나 한국을 포함한 아시아 국가에서 수행된 연구는 없다. - 국제암연구재단 암예방수칙과 한국 암예방수칙을 준수하는 한국인 남성에서 암 발생 감소가 관찰되었다. 이러한 관련성은 암종에 따라 다르게 나타났다.
Key Message
- The adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute of Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) guidelines on cancer prevention has been addressed in several studies in Western countries. -Among the Korean population, adherence to WCRF/AICR cancer prevention guidelines as well as the Korean cancer prevention guidelines helps prevent cancer in men. Association varies by gender and type of cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Compliance with the WCRF/AICR Recommendations in Qualitative Adaptation and the Occurrence of Breast Cancer: A Case-Control Study
    Beata Stasiewicz, Lidia Wadolowska, Maciej Biernacki, Malgorzata Anna Slowinska, Ewa Stachowska
    Cancers.2024; 16(2): 468.     CrossRef
Systematic Reviews
The status quo of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals in Korea: a study focused on protocol registration and GRADE use
Mi Ah Han, Seong Jung Kim, Eu Chang Hwang, Jae Hung Jung
Epidemiol Health. 2022;44:e2022108.   Published online November 15, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2022108
  • 2,761 View
  • 66 Download
AbstractAbstract AbstractSummary PDFSupplementary Material
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
This study investigated the status quo of systematic reviews published in major journals in Korea from the perspective of protocol registration and adopting the grading of recommendation, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) system.
METHODS
We examined systematic reviews published in Korea’s top 15 medical journals from 2018 to 2021. Teams of 2 reviewers assessed the studies’ eligibility criteria and extracted data independently and in duplicate. We collected information on study characteristics, protocol registration, and GRADE use of the included reviews, and reviewed the “Instructions for Authors” of the selected journals to assess any guidance related to systematic reviews.
RESULTS
Out of the 126 identified reviews, 18 (14.3%) reported that they registered or published their protocol. Only 5 (4.0%) rated the certainty of evidence; and all 5 used the GRADE system. Only 6 of 15 journals mentioned systematic reviews in their “Instructions for Authors.” Six journals endorsed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework for systematic review reporting (2 mandatory, 3 recommended, and 1 unclear). None of the journals included mentioned protocol registration or certainty of evidence in their authors’ guidelines.
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, the proportion of systematic reviews that had prior protocol registration or used the GRADE approach to rate the certainty of evidence was very low. Our study highlights the need for adherence to systematic review standards in medical journals in Korea, including prior protocol registration and certainty of evidence assessment. Our review will help improve the quality of systematic reviews in Korea.
Summary
Korean summary
한국 의학 저널에서 계획서를 사전에 등록하거나 근거의 확실성을 평가하기 위해 GRADE 접근 방식을 사용한 체계적 문헌고찰의 분율은 낮았다. 우리의 연구는 계획서 등록 및 근거의 확실성 평가를 포함하여 체계적 문헌고찰의 방법론적 표준 준수의 필요성을 강조한다.
Key Message
The proportion of systematic reviews that had prior protocol registration or used the GRADE approach to rate the certainty of evidence was very low in Korean medical journals, and our study highlights the need for adherence to systematic review standards in medical journals in Korea, including prior protocol registration and certainty of evidence assessment.
Quality of biosafety guidelines for dental clinical practice throughout the world in the early COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review
Renata Cristina Soares, Juliana Schaia Rocha, Saulo Vinicius da Rosa, Jéssica Rodrigues da Silva Noll Gonçalves, Priscilla Lesly Perlas Condori, Ana Elisa Ribeiro, Samuel Jorge Moysés, Márcia Helena Baldani
Epidemiol Health. 2021;43:e2021089.   Published online October 22, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2021089
  • 9,497 View
  • 202 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
AbstractAbstract AbstractSummary PDFSupplementary Material
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To conduct a systematic review of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related biosafety guidelines for dental clinical practice in the early stage of the pandemic, focusing on quality assessment.
METHODS
Electronic (via PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature database, Brazilian Library in Dentistry, and Cochrane Library) and gray literature searches were performed for documents published up to May 12, 2020. Guidelines updated until April 17, 2021 were identified. Documents were included as guidelines if they (1) consisted of a set of statements, directions, or principles presenting current or future rules or policy; (2) were developed by government agencies, institutions, organizations, or expert panels; and (3) were related to the general conduct of healthcare activities rather a particular condition. Two researchers, using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II, independently extracted the recommendations and evaluated the quality of the guidelines.
RESULTS
Twenty-seven documents from 19 countries were included in the review. These documents presented 122 recommendations related to (1) professional biosafety; (2) patients’/companions’ safety; (3) the organization and biosafety of the physical dental facility environment; and (4) the work process in dental care. Overall, the scientific quality of the guidelines was considered low. Some recommendations presented in these guidelines would require further research to establish their effectiveness.
CONCLUSIONS
We found a wide variety of biosafety guidelines for dental practice regarding COVID-19 in the early months of the pandemic, but their quality was low. Biosafety recommendations should be frequently updated.
Summary
Key Message
Despite the wide variety of biosafety guidelines for dental practice regarding COVID-19 in the early months of the pandemic, their quality was low. These findings demonstrate the need for more guidelines for dental practice with more high-quality evidence, focusing on clarification of the strictness of development, financing, conflicts of interest, and applicability. Guidelines with high scientific quality are essential for the formation of a robust scientific consensus facilitating the ability to offer safer and more reliable procedures in the pandemic context.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Impact of COVID-19 on Dental Practices in El Salvador and Mexico: A Comprehensive Survey Analysis
    Nuria Patiño-Marín, Wendy Yesenia Escobar de González, Katleen Argentina Aguirre de Rodríguez, Miguel Angel Casillas Santana, Carlo Eduardo Medina-Solís, Guillermo Alfonso Aguirre Escobar, Gabriel Alejandro Martínez-Castañón, Marco Salas
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
Perspectives
Suggestions for the promotion of evidence-based public health in South Korea
Jong-Myon Bae
Epidemiol Health. 2017;39:e2017030.   Published online July 19, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2017030
  • 14,352 View
  • 213 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
AbstractAbstract AbstractSummary PDFSupplementary Material
Abstract
Evidence-based public health (EBPH) is defined as public health decision-making based on current best evidence. Debates about the latent tuberculosis infection control program suggested by the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2017 highlight the need to promote EBPH. Three strategies have been proposed, including providing necessary evidence by evaluating policy-evidence gaps; delivering high-quality, relevant, and timely evidence by conducting systematic reviews and adapting public health guidelines; and making value-driven decisions by training and educating public health policymakers.
Summary
Korean summary
근거중심 공중보건 (EBPH)는 공중보건영역에서 최신과 최선의 근거에 기반하여 의사결정을 하는 것이다. EBPH를 활성화하기 위해서는 정책-근거 간의 간극을 알아내고, 체계적 고찰을 통한 공중보건지침을 개발하며, 의사결정참여자의 역량을 높이기 위한 교육훈련을 추진하는 것이다.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparative efficacy on outcomes of C-CABG, OPCAB, and ONBEAT in coronary heart disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lin Zhu, Dongjie Li, Xu Zhang, Sitong Wan, Yuyong Liu, HongJia Zhang, Junjie Luo, Yongting Luo, Peng An, Wenjian Jiang
    International Journal of Surgery.2023; 109(12): 4263.     CrossRef
  • Ethical, pedagogical, socio-political and anthropological implications of quaternary prevention
    Marc Jamoulle, Michel Roland, Jong-Myon Bae, Bruno Heleno, Giorgio Visentin, Gustavo Diniz Ferreira Gusso, Maciek Godycki-Ćwirko, Miguel Pizzanell, Patrick Ouvrard, Ricardo La Valle, Luis Filipe Gomes, Daniel Widmer, Jorge Bernstein, Mariana Mariño, Hamil
    Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade.2018; 13(40): 1.     CrossRef
  • Network meta-analysis: application and practice using Stata
    Sungryul Shim, Byung-Ho Yoon, In-Soo Shin, Jong-Myon Bae
    Epidemiology and Health.2017; 39: e2017047.     CrossRef
An opposing view on including high school students in a latent tuberculosis infection control program in Korea
Jong-Myon Bae
Epidemiol Health. 2017;39:e2017015.   Published online March 31, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2017015
  • 14,492 View
  • 201 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
AbstractAbstract AbstractSummary PDFSupplementary Material
Abstract
The Korea Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention (KCDC) has announced a control program against latent <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> infection (LTBI), for a “TB-safe country” this year with the goal of a “TB-free Korea” by 2025. The program includes high school students as one target group; however, some school health teachers and parents have expressed their opposition to this. The 2015 World Health Organization guidelines do not recommend inclusion of asymptomatic high school students in LTBI control programs. Based on this guideline, the KCDC should consider excluding this population from the program.
Summary
Korean summary
질병관리본부는 결핵안심국가를 만들기 위하여 고등학교 1학년생을 포함한 잠복결핵감염 검사사업을 2017년 추진하기로 공고하였다. 그러나 2015년에 발표된 WHO 지침에 따르면 해당 대상자들은 검사대상자로 제시되어 있지않다. 근거중심의 보건정책 추진을 위해서 사업 대상 선정을 재검토할 필요가 있다.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The cascade of care for latent tuberculosis infection in congregate settings: A national cohort analysis, Korea, 2017–2018
    Jinsoo Min, Hyung Woo Kim, Helen R. Stagg, Molebogeng X. Rangaka, Marc Lipman, Ibrahim Abubakar, Yunhee Lee, Jun-Pyo Myong, Hyunsuk Jeong, Sanghyuk Bae, Ah Young Shin, Ji Young Kang, Sung-Soon Lee, Jae Seuk Park, Hyeon Woo Yim, Ju Sang Kim
    Frontiers in Medicine.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Latent tuberculosis infection: recent progress and challenges in South Korea
    Doosoo Jeon
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2020; 35(2): 269.     CrossRef
  • Vitamin D supplementation as a control program against latent tuberculosis infection in Korean high school students
    Eun Hee Kim, Jong-Myon Bae
    Epidemiology and Health.2018; 40: e2018035.     CrossRef
  • Suggestions for the promotion of evidence-based public health in South Korea
    Jong-Myon Bae
    Epidemiology and Health.2017; 39: e2017030.     CrossRef
  • 결핵정책에 대하여
    찬병 박
    Public Health Affairs.2017; 1(1): 13.     CrossRef
Editorial
Korean translation of the CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials
Jun Suh Lee, Soyeon Ahn, Kyoung Ho Lee, Jee Hyun Kim
Epidemiol Health. 2014;36:e2014029.   Published online November 8, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih/e2014029
  • 20,530 View
  • 446 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 20 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Abstract
The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 Statement, updated in March 2010, includes a 25-item checklist and flow diagram. Adherence to this statement is a minimum requirement for the complete, clear, and transparent reporting of randomized trials. We translated the CONSORT 2010 Statement into Korean to promote the widespread adherence to CONSORT in South Korea and to facilitate the adoption of complete, clear, and transparent reporting. The Korean version of the CONSORT is available at http://www.e-epih.org/.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effect of a Customized Physical Activity Promotion Program on Visceral Fat and Glycemic Parameters in Individuals With Prediabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Radhika A. Jadhav, G. Arun Maiya, Shashikiran Umakanth, K.N. Shivashankara
    Journal of Physical Activity and Health.2024; 21(2): 164.     CrossRef
  • Understanding the mechanism of acupuncture in acute cerebral infraction through a proteomic analysis: protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Jiangpeng Cao, Yuanhao Du, Xiumei Yin, Na Zheng, Jiawei Han, Linling Chen, Lanyu Jia
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Perspectives on the application of CONSORT guidelines to randomised controlled trials in nutrition
    Jessica Rigutto-Farebrother, Sanne Ahles, Janet Cade, Karen J. Murphy, Jogchum Plat, Lukas Schwingshackl, Helen M. Roche, Sangeetha Shyam, Carl Lachat, Anne-Marie Minihane, Connie Weaver
    European Journal of Nutrition.2023; 62(5): 2319.     CrossRef
  • Effects of integrative neuromuscular training on the gait biomechanics of children with overweight and obesity
    Pablo Molina‐Garcia, Alejandro Molina‐Molina, Annemie Smeets, Jairo H. Migueles, Francisco B. Ortega, Jos Vanrenterghem
    Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports.2022; 32(7): 1119.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Evaluation of Digital Therapeutics: Present and Future
    Ki Young Huh, Jaeseong Oh, SeungHwan Lee, Kyung-Sang Yu
    Healthcare Informatics Research.2022; 28(3): 188.     CrossRef
  • The hematological impact of umbilical cord milking versus delayed cord clamping in premature neonates: a randomized controlled trial
    Hytham Atia, Ahmed Badawie, Osama Elsaid, Mahmoud Kashef, Nourhan Alhaddad, Mohamed Gomaa
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation and Management of Dyspnea in Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome and Generalized Hypermobility Spectrum Disorder: Protocol for a Pilot and Feasibility Randomized Control Trial (Preprint)
    Dmitry Rozenberg, Noor Al Kaabi, Encarna Camacho, Sahar Nourouzpour, Laura Lopez-Hernandez, Laura McGillis, Ewan Goligher, Darlene Reid, Chung-Wai Chow, Clodagh M. Ryan, Dinesh Kumbhare, Ella Huszti, Kateri Champagne, Satish Raj, Susanna Mak, Daniel Santa
    JMIR Research Protocols.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The effect of dietary phytochemicals on nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) activation: a systematic review of human intervention trials
    Tom Clifford, Jarred P. Acton, Stuart P. Cocksedge, Kelly A. Bowden Davies, Stephen J. Bailey
    Molecular Biology Reports.2021; 48(2): 1745.     CrossRef
  • Reporting quality of surgical randomised controlled trials in head and neck cancer: a systematic review
    Netanya Aarabi Canagarajah, George James Porter, Kurchi Mitra, Timothy Shun Man Chu
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.2021; 278(11): 4125.     CrossRef
  • Oral Chinese Herbal Medicine for Depressive Disorder in Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ya-jun Xue, Ying Xie, Guo-liang Zhao, Bo-da Zhou, Kun Li, Si-yuan Li, Ping Zhang
    Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine.2020; 26(8): 617.     CrossRef
  • A Review of Recent Acupuncture Treatment for Hypertension - PubMed and Domestic Studies
    Seung-yeon Kim, Jae-ho Won, In Lee
    The Journal of Internal Korean Medicine.2020; 41(1): 29.     CrossRef
  • Quality Assessment of Studies on Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) of Acupuncture Treatment for Mild Cognitive Impairment: Based on the STRICTA and CONSORT Guidelines
    Yeo-og Shin, Woo-young Heo, In Lee
    The Journal of Internal Korean Medicine.2019; 40(6): 1101.     CrossRef
  • Randomised controlled trial to determine the efficacy and safety of prescribed water intake to prevent kidney failure due to autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (PREVENT-ADPKD)
    Annette T Y Wong, Carly Mannix, Jared J Grantham, Margaret Allman-Farinelli, Sunil V Badve, Neil Boudville, Karen Byth, Jessie Chan, Susan Coulshed, Marie E Edwards, Bradley J Erickson, Mangalee Fernando, Sheryl Foster, Imad Haloob, David C H Harris, Carm
    BMJ Open.2018; 8(1): e018794.     CrossRef
  • Fistula in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients—A Systematic Scoping Review
    Negar Salimi, Jolanta Aleksejūnienė, Edwin H.K. Yen, Angelina Y.C. Loo
    Annals of Plastic Surgery.2017; 78(1): 91.     CrossRef
  • Xingnao Kaiqiao needling method for acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis of safety and efficacy
    Zhi-xin Yang, Jia-hong Xie, Ding-ding Liu
    Neural Regeneration Research.2017; 12(8): 1308.     CrossRef
  • A new injury prevention programme for children’s football – FIFA 11+ Kids – can improve motor performance: a cluster-randomised controlled trial
    R Rössler, L Donath, M Bizzini, O Faude
    Journal of Sports Sciences.2016; 34(6): 549.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of CONSORT compliance in TRANSFUSION
    Anushka M. Jaffer, Grace Wang, Rebecca L. Barty, Andrew W. Shih
    Transfusion.2016; 56(4): 789.     CrossRef
  • Sodium bicarbonate infusion in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation: a single center randomized controlled pilot trial
    Laurence Weinberg, Jeremy Broad, Param Pillai, Guangjun Chen, Micheline Nguyen, Glenn M. Eastwood, Nick Scurrah, Mehrdad Nikfarjam, David Story, Larry McNicol, Rinaldo Bellomo
    Clinical Transplantation.2016; 30(5): 556.     CrossRef
  • Sex‐dependent disparities in critical illness: methodological implications for critical care research
    Elizabeth DE Papathanassoglou, Nicos Middleton, Kathleen Hegadoren
    Nursing in Critical Care.2015; 20(2): 58.     CrossRef
  • BEWARE: Body awareness training in the treatment of wearing-off related anxiety in patients with Parkinson’s disease: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Ires Ghielen, Odile A. van den Heuvel, Cees J. T. de Goede, Marieke Houniet-de Gier, Emma H. Collette, Ingrid A. L. Burgers-Bots, Sonja Rutten, Gert Kwakkel, Kees Vermunt, Bep van Vliet, Henk W. Berendse, Erwin E. H. van Wegen
    Trials.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
Methods
Methodological issues for determining intervals of subsequent cancer screening
Jong-Myon Bae
Epidemiol Health. 2014;36:e2014010.   Published online July 30, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih/e2014010
  • 17,942 View
  • 141 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
AbstractAbstract AbstractSummary PDFSupplementary Material
Abstract
The gap between nationwide recommendations of cancer screening and the related evidences obtained from Korean adults should be filled. Estimation of the mean sojourn time (MST) in a specific cancer is important to determine the intervals of subsequent screening. This author arranged the methods for calculating MST into 5 categories based on the parameters used. Under the legal barrier for protection of individual privacy and confidentiality in a Korean academic situation, the methods involving the use of transition rates or prevalence/incidence ratio would be applicable among these methods.
Summary
Korean summary
국가 암조기 검진사업에서 제시하는 검진지침은 우리나라 국민을 대상으로 한 역학연구 결과에 근거하여 개발해야 한다. 특정 암에 대한 조기검진 지침에는 검진방법, 시작 및 종료 연령과 함께 검사 주기를 담아야 한다. 이중 반복검사의 간격은 해당 암의 평균체류기간을 산출하여 결정한다. 저자는 특정 암의 평균체류기간을 구하는 방법을 5가지로 분류하여 제시하였다. 또한 현재 개인정보 보호를 강조하는 여건에서 수행이 가능한 방법을 검토하였다.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Quantifying the duration of the preclinical detectable phase in cancer screening: a systematic review
    Sandra M. E. Geurts, Anne M. W. M. Aarts, André L. M. Verbeek, Tony H. H. Chen, Mireille J. M. Broeders, Stephen W. Duffy
    Epidemiology and Health.2022; 44: e2022008.     CrossRef
  • Baseline and annual repeat rounds of screening: implications for optimal regimens of screening
    Claudia I. Henschke, Mary Salvatore, Matthew Cham, Charles A. Powell, Larry DiFabrizio, Raja Flores, Andrew Kaufman, Corey Eber, Rowena Yip, David F. Yankelevitz
    European Radiology.2018; 28(3): 1085.     CrossRef
  • Optimal Interval for Repeated Gastric Cancer Screening in Normal-Risk Healthy Korean Adults: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Jong-Myon Bae, Sang Yop Shin, Eun Hee Kim
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2015; 47(4): 564.     CrossRef
  • Narrative Reviews
    Jong-Myon Bae
    Epidemiology and Health.2014; : e2014018.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Gastric Cancer Screening and Surveillance in High-Risk Groups
    Il Ju Choi
    Clinical Endoscopy.2014; 47(6): 497.     CrossRef

Epidemiol Health : Epidemiology and Health