OBJECTIVES Rates of attempted deliberate self-poisoning (DSP) are subject to undercounting, underreporting, and denial of the suicide attempt. In this study, we estimated the rate of underreported DSP, which is the most common method of attempted suicide in Iran.
METHODS
We estimated the rate and number of unaccounted individuals who attempted DSP in western Iran in 2015 using a truncated count model. In this method, the number of people who attempted DSP but were not referred to any health care centers, n<sub>0</sub> , was calculated through integrating hospital and forensic data. The crude and age-adjusted rates of attempted DSP were estimated directly using the average population size of the city of Kermanshah and the World Health Organization (WHO) world standard population with and without accounting for underreporting. The Monte Carlo method was used to determine the confidence level.
RESULTS
The recorded number of people who attempted DSP was estimated by different methods to be in the range of 46.6 to 53.2% of the actual number of individuals who attempted DSP. The rate of underreported cases was higher among women than men and decreased as age increased. The rate of underreported cases decreased as the potency and intensity of toxic factors increased. The highest underreporting rates of 69.9, 51.2, and 21.5% were observed when oil and detergents (International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision [ICD-10] code: X66), medications (ICD-10 code: X60-X64), and agricultural toxins (ICD-10 codes: X68, X69) were used for poisoning, respectively. Crude rates, with and without accounting for underreporting, were estimated by the mixture method as 167.5 per 100,000 persons and 331.7 per 100,000 persons, respectively, which decreased to 129.8 per 100,000 persons and 253.1 per 100,000 persons after adjusting for age on the basis of the WHO world standard population.
CONCLUSIONS
Nearly half of individuals who attempted DSP were not referred to a hospital for treatment or denied the suicide attempt for political or sociocultural reasons. Individuals with no access to counseling services are at a higher risk for repeated suicide attempts and fatal suicides.
Summary
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A validated dilute-and-shoot LC–MS-MS urine screening for the analysis of 95 illicit drugs and medicines: Insights from clinical and forensic Brazilian cases Bruno Pereira Dos Santos, Letícia Birk, Patrícia Schwarz, Viviane Cristina Sebben, Ângela Malysz Sgaravatti, Giovanna Cristiano de Gouveia, Adriana Ubirajara Silva Petry, Francisco Paz de Menezes, Alexsandro Pinto Gonzaga, Paula Flores Schlickmann, Marcel Journal of Analytical Toxicology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Emergency department nurses’ perceptions of caring for patients with intentional self-poisoning: a qualitative study Salar Sharifi, Sina Valiee Emergency Care Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Age Changes and Suicidal Activity in Iran Over the Past Decade: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Hamid Sharif Nia, Mohammad Heidari, Navaz Naghavi, Rebecca H. Lehto, Ali Akbar Haghdoost, Azar Jafari-Koulaee, Yasaman Hatef Matbue, Ameneh Yaghoobzadeh, Amir Hossein Goudarzian, Saeed Pahlevan Sharif OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying.2022; 86(1): 312. CrossRef
Discovering the Unclassified Suicide Cases Among Undetermined Drug Overdose Deaths Using Machine Learning Techniques Daphne Liu, Mia Yu, Jeffrey Duncan, Anna Fondario, Hadi Kharrazi, Paul S. Nestadt Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior.2020; 50(2): 333. CrossRef
Psychiatric Assessment of Deliberate Self-Poisoning Mehdi Moradinazar, Mehdi Shaygani, Mary Ataei, Rosita Naseri Psychiatric Annals.2019; 49(8): 362. CrossRef
OBJECTIVES Obesity is a well-recognized risk factor for type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) among young and middle-aged adults in South Korea. To elaborate on the association between obesity and DM, subjective data from self-reporting survey or objective data from health examination is generally used. This study was conducted to validate the change of association from using these different measurements.
METHODS
Community Health Survey data and Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, as subjective and objective data respectively, were used. Population, resident in Seoul and over 45 aged, were selected for the study and the association between obesity and DM were defined by using multivariate logistic regression model.
RESULTS
In subjective data, DM prevalence was 12.4% (male, 14.7; female, 10.6) and obesity prevalence was 26.0% (male, 29.2; female, 23.4). Whereas, in objective data, DM prevalence was 15.0% (male, 17.8; female, 12.9), and obese population was 32.4% (male, 34.4; female, 30.8). Based on the effect of obesity on DM prevalence from each data, using objective data increased the impact of obesity. Difference of relative risk of obesity between from subjective data and from objective was bigger in female than male and statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS
The differences of association pattern between subjective and objective data were found, due to higher obesity prevalence in objective data, and discrepancies of socio-economic status. These discrepancies could be inevitable Therefore we have to face them proactively, and understand the different aspect of various variables from different measurement.
Summary
Korean summary
지역사회건강조사는 각 지역의 건강관련 지표들을 제시하기 위한 기본 목적을 가지고 있으나, 자가보고를 통한 자료수집에 의존하고 있다는 면에서 연구결과의 신뢰성에 한계를 가지고 있다고 인식되어왔다. 본 연구는 실측자료와 자가보고자료에서의 분석결과차이를 파악함으로써, 이러한 인식에 대한 직접적 평가와 더불어, 자가보고자료에 대한 활용도 증진에 기여하고자 하였다. 연구 결과, 비만의 당뇨병에 대한 영향은 실측자료보다 자가보고자료에서 더 작아졌고, 이러한 차이는 남성에서보다 여성에서 더 크게 나타났다.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Comparison of estimates and time series stability of Korea Community Health Survey and Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Ji Son Ki, Ho Kim Epidemiology and Health.2019; 41: e2019012. CrossRef
<p>The quality of reporting of cohort studies published in the most prestigious scientific medical journals was investigated to indicate to what extent the items in the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist are addressed. Six top scientific medical journals with high impact factor were selected including New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, Lancet, British Medical Journal, Archive of Internal Medicine, and Canadian Medical Association Journal. Ten cohort studies published in 2010 were selected randomly from each journal. The percentage of items in the STROBE checklist that were addressed in each study was investigated. The total percentage of items addressed by these studies was 69.3 (95% confidence interval: 59.6 to 79.0). We concluded that reporting of <italic>cohort</italic> studies published in the most prestigious scientific medical journals is not clear enough yet. The reporting of other types of observational studies such as case-control and cross-sectional studies particularly those being published in less prestigious journals expected to be much more imprecise.</p>
Summary
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Age is just a number: The role of advanced age in predicting complications following ventral hernia repair with component separation Lauren E. Berger, Samuel S. Huffman, Grace Bloomfield, Julian K. Marable, Daisy L. Spoer, Holly D. Shan, Romina Deldar, Karen K. Evans, Parag Bhanot, Yewande R. Alimi The American Journal of Surgery.2024; 229: 162. CrossRef
Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Everyday Neurosurgical Practice in Alsace, France: Lessons Learned, Current Perspectives, and Future Challenges—Preliminary Results of a Longitudinal Multicentric Study Registry Guillaume Dannhoff, Charles-Henry Mallereau, Mario Ganau, Biagio Roberto Carangelo, Giorgio Spatola, Julien Todeschi, Lara Prisco, Rodolfo Maduri, Marie des Neiges Santin, Sandrine Woelffel, Isabella Mastrobuono, Jimmy Voirin, Franco Moruzzi, Beniamino Na Medicina.2024; 60(3): 390. CrossRef
Chemotherapy‐induced cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors: A systematic review of studies from 2000 to 2021 Omid Amani, Mohammad Ali Mazaheri, Mona Malekzadeh Moghani, Fariba Zarani, Rasool Hamidi Choolabi Cancer Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Pathology stewardship in emergency departments: a single-site, retrospective, cohort study of the value of C-reactive protein in patients with suspected sepsis Stephanie Athan, David Athan, Michael Wong, Nurul Hussain, Venkat Vangaveti, Vinay Gangathimmaiah, Robert Norton Pathology.2023; 55(5): 673. CrossRef
The relation between obesity and breast cancer risk in women by considering menstruation status and geographical variations: a systematic review and meta-analysis Tania Dehesh, Shohreh Fadaghi, Mehrnaz Seyedi, Elham Abolhadi, Mehran Ilaghi, Parisa Shams, Fatemeh Ajam, Mohammad Amin Mosleh-Shirazi, Paria Dehesh BMC Women's Health.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Objective Measurement of Ball-Handling Proficiency in Wheelchair Sports: A Systematic Review Viola C. Altmann, Barry S. Mason, Tijmen Geurts, Sanne A. J. H. van de Camp, Yves C. Vanlandewijck Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
The Attention Network Test in Parkinson and Lewy Body Disease: A Systematic Review Jihyun Yang, Dana Pourzinal, Toby Rheinberger, David A. Copland, Katie L. McMahon, Gerard J. Byrne, Nadeeka N. Dissanayaka Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology.2022; 35(1): 1. CrossRef
Longitudinal association between caesarean section birth and cardio‐vascular risk profiles among adolescents in Australia Tahmina Begum, Yaqoot Fatima, Satyamurthy Anuradha, Md Hasan, Abdullah Al Mamun Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health.2022; 46(6): 776. CrossRef
Associations of caesarean section with body mass and waist circumference trajectories from age 2 to 13 years: A nationally representative birth cohort study in Australia Tahmina Begum, Yaqoot Fatima, Francisco Perales, Satyamurthy Anuradha, Abdullah Mamun Pediatric Obesity.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Investigating the real impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the daily neurosurgical practice? G. Dannhoff, H. Cebula, S. Chibbaro, M. Ganau, J. Todeschi, C.-H. Mallereau, J. Pottecher, F. Proust, I. Ollivier Neurochirurgie.2021; 67(2): 99. CrossRef
Prevalence of Depression in Iranian College Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Zahra Jaafari, Akram Farhadi, Faramarz Amin Lari, Fatemeh Sadat Mousavi, Hadis Moltafet, Elaheh Dashti, Maryam Marzban Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
A systematic review of the quality of conduct and reporting of survival analyses of tuberculosis outcomes in Africa Moses M. Ngari, Susanne Schmitz, Christopher Maronga, Lazarus K. Mramba, Michel Vaillant BMC Medical Research Methodology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
General practice attendances among patients attending a post-COVID-19 clinic: a pilot study John Broughan, Geoff McCombe, Gordana Avramovic, Des Crowley, Cheyenne Downey, Joanne Downey O'Sullivan, Ronan Fawsitt, Tina McHugh, Eileen O'Connor, Carla Perrotta, Aoife G Cotter, John S Lambert, Walter Cullen BJGP Open.2021; 5(3): BJGPO.2021.0016. CrossRef
Sleep disturbances and cognitive impairment in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a systematic review and narrative synthesis Sean P. Carruthers, Gemma Brunetti, Susan L. Rossell Sleep Medicine.2021; 84: 8. CrossRef
Bedside estimates of dead space using end-tidal CO2 are independently associated with mortality in ARDS Paola Lecompte-Osorio, Steven D. Pearson, Cole H. Pieroni, Matthew R. Stutz, Anne S. Pohlman, Julie Lin, Jesse B. Hall, Yu M. Htwe, Patrick G. Belvitch, Steven M. Dudek, Krysta Wolfe, Bhakti K. Patel, John P. Kress Critical Care.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
A meta-review demonstrates improved reporting quality of qualitative reviews following the publication of COREQ- and ENTREQ-checklists, regardless of modest uptake Y. de Jong, E. M. van der Willik, J. Milders, C. G. N. Voorend, Rachael L. Morton, F. W. Dekker, Y. Meuleman, M. van Diepen BMC Medical Research Methodology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Using STROBE checklist to assess the reporting quality of observational studies affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, and its correlates: a scientometric study from Iran Negin Rahmani, Alireza Salehi, Hossein Molavi Vardanjani, Maryam Marzban, Arezoo Behbood Scientometrics.2020; 122(2): 989. CrossRef
Completeness of reporting of case reports in high‐impact medical journals José A. Calvache, Maira Vera‐Montoya, Darío Ordoñez, Adrian V. Hernandez, Douglas Altman, David Moher European Journal of Clinical Investigation.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Study Protocol: Prospective, observational, cohort study of COVID-19 in General Practice (North Dublin COVID-19 Cohort [‘ANTICIPATE’] Study) Walter Cullen, Gordana Avramovic, John Broughan, Mary-Carmel Burke, Aoife Cotter, Des Crowley, Joanne Downey, Paul Duggan, Ronan Fawsitt, Allys Guerandel, Eilis Hennessy, Cecily Kelleher, Gerald Mills, Geoff McCombe, Tina McHugh, Eileen O’Connor, Carla Pe HRB Open Research.2020; 3: 67. CrossRef
TRIPOD statement: a preliminary pre-post analysis of reporting and methods of prediction models Amir H Zamanipoor Najafabadi, Chava L Ramspek, Friedo W Dekker, Pauline Heus, Lotty Hooft, Karel G M Moons, Wilco C Peul, Gary S Collins, Ewout W Steyerberg, Merel van Diepen BMJ Open.2020; 10(9): e041537. CrossRef
Quality, Equity and Utility of Observational Studies during 10 Years of Implementing the Structured Operational Research and Training Initiative in 72 Countries Rony Zachariah, Stefanie Rust, Pruthu Thekkur, Mohammed Khogali, Ajay MV Kumar, Karapet Davtyan, Ermias Diro, Srinath Satyanarayana, Olga Denisiuk, Johan van Griensven, Veerle Hermans, Selma Dar Berger, Saw Saw, Anthony Reid, Abraham Aseffa, Anthony D Har Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease.2020; 5(4): 167. CrossRef
Causal models adjusting for time-varying confounding—a systematic review of the literature Philip J Clare, Timothy A Dobbins, Richard P Mattick International Journal of Epidemiology.2019; 48(1): 254. CrossRef
Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis Milad Azami, Mohammad Hossein YektaKooshali, Masoumeh Shohani, Ali Khorshidi, Leily Mahmudi, Aristeidis H. Katsanos PLOS ONE.2019; 14(4): e0214738. CrossRef
Is latent tuberculosis infection challenging in Iranian health care workers? A systematic review and meta-analysis Mohammad Hossein YektaKooshali, Farahnaz Movahedzadeh, Ali Alavi Foumani, Hoda Sabati, Alireza Jafari, HASNAIN SEYED EHTESHAM PLOS ONE.2019; 14(10): e0223335. CrossRef
Effect of dietary habits on the risk of metabolic syndrome: Yazd Healthy Heart Project Mohammadtaghi Sarebanhassanabadi, Seyed Jalil Mirhosseini, Masoud Mirzaei, Seyedeh Mahdieh Namayandeh, Mohammad Hossein Soltani, Mohammadreza Pakseresht, Ali Pedarzadeh, Zahra Baramesipour, Reza Faraji, Amin Salehi-Abargouei Public Health Nutrition.2018; 21(6): 1139. CrossRef
Use of the STROBE Checklist to Evaluate the Reporting Quality of Observational Research in Obstetrics April D. Adams, Rebecca S. Benner, Thomas W. Riggs, Nancy C. Chescheir Obstetrics & Gynecology.2018; 132(2): 507. CrossRef
¿Es completo el reporte de los estudios observacionales publicados en la Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología? Estudio de corte transversal Mary Bravo-Peña, Luis Barona-Fong, Julio Campo-López, Yeni Arroyave, José Andrés Calvache Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología.2017; 45(1): 31. CrossRef
Assessing the completeness of reporting of observational studies in Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology. Cross sectional study Mary Bravo-Peña, Luis Barona-Fong, Julio Campo-López, Yeni Arroyave, José Andrés Calvache Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology.2017; 45(1): 31. CrossRef
Factors influencing quality of life following lower limb amputation for peripheral arterial occlusive disease Fiona Davie-Smith, Elaine Coulter, Brian Kennon, Sally Wyke, Lorna Paul Prosthetics & Orthotics International.2017; 41(6): 537. CrossRef
Assessing the completeness of reporting of observational studies in Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology. Cross sectional study☆ Mary Bravo-Peña, Luis Barona-Fong, Julio Campo-López, Yeni Arroyave, José Andrés Calvache Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology.2017; 45(1): 31. CrossRef
Association between morning symptoms and physical activity in COPD: a systematic review Amanda R. van Buul, Marise J. Kasteleyn, Niels H. Chavannes, Christian Taube European Respiratory Review.2017; 26(143): 160033. CrossRef
Evaluation of the Endorsement of the STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA) Statement on the Reporting Quality of Published Genetic Association Studies Darko Nedovic, Nikola Panic, Roberta Pastorino, Walter Ricciardi, Stefania Boccia Journal of Epidemiology.2016; 26(8): 399. CrossRef
Recurrence of vaginal prolapse after total vaginal hysterectomy with concurrent vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: comparison between normal-weight and overweight women Carlo Rappa, Gabriele Saccone American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.2016; 215(5): 601.e1. CrossRef
Quality of Reporting and Study Design of CKD Cohort Studies Assessing Mortality in the Elderly Before and After STROBE: A Systematic Review Anirudh Rao, Katharina Brück, Shona Methven, Rebecca Evans, Vianda S. Stel, Kitty J. Jager, Lotty Hooft, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Fergus Caskey, Xu-jie Zhou PLOS ONE.2016; 11(5): e0155078. CrossRef
The impact of trunk impairment on performance of wheelchair activities with a focus on wheelchair court sports: a systematic review Viola C Altmann, Anne L Hart, Yves C Vanlandewijck, Jacques van Limbeek, Miranda L van Hooff Sports Medicine - Open.2015;[Epub] CrossRef
Fundamentals of Clinical Outcomes Assessment for Spinal Disorders: Study Designs, Methodologies, and Analyses Patrick Vavken, Anne Kathleen B. Ganal-Antonio, Francis H. Shen, Jens R. Chapman, Dino Samartzis Global Spine Journal.2015; 5(2): 156. CrossRef
Scientific reporting is suboptimal for aspects that characterize genetic risk prediction studies: a review of published articles based on the Genetic RIsk Prediction Studies statement Adriana I. Iglesias, Raluca Mihaescu, John P.A. Ioannidis, Muin J. Khoury, Julian Little, Cornelia M. van Duijn, A. Cecile J.W. Janssens Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.2014; 67(5): 487. CrossRef
Cost-efficiency of knowledge creation Rafael Struck, Georg Baumgarten, Maria Wittmann Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology.2014; 27(2): 190. CrossRef
Using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement to Assess Reporting of Observational Trials in Hand Surgery Amelia A. Sorensen, Robert D. Wojahn, Mary Claire Manske, Ryan P. Calfee The Journal of Hand Surgery.2013; 38(8): 1584. CrossRef
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Work-Related Cause of de Quervain Tenosynovitis Stéphane Stahl, Daniel Vida, Christoph Meisner, Oliver Lotter, Jens Rothenberger, Hans-Eberhard Schaller, Adelana Santos Stahl Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.2013; 132(6): 1479. CrossRef
Strategies to Improve Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting: A Critical and Systematic Review Cristian Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Elena Lopez-Gonzalez, Maria T. Herdeiro, Adolfo Figueiras Drug Safety.2013; 36(5): 317. CrossRef
The quality of reporting in clinical research: the CONSORT and STROBE initiatives Davide Bolignano, Francesco Mattace-Raso, Claudia Torino, Graziella D’Arrigo, Samar Abd ElHafeez, Fabio Provenzano, Carmine Zoccali, Giovanni Tripepi Aging Clinical and Experimental Research.2013; 25(1): 9. CrossRef
Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Nikola Panic, Emanuele Leoncini, Giulio de Belvis, Walter Ricciardi, Stefania Boccia, Gemma Elizabeth Derrick PLoS ONE.2013; 8(12): e83138. CrossRef
Impact of STROBE Statement Publication on Quality of Observational Study Reporting: Interrupted Time Series versus Before-After Analysis Sylvie Bastuji-Garin, Emilie Sbidian, Caroline Gaudy-Marqueste, Emilie Ferrat, Jean-Claude Roujeau, Marie-Aleth Richard, Florence Canoui-Poitrine, C. Mary Schooling PLoS ONE.2013; 8(8): e64733. CrossRef
Reporting Quality of Abstracts Presented at the European Association of Urology Meeting: A Critical Assessment Marco De Sio, Rachid Yakoubi, Cosimo De Nunzio, Rocco Damiano, Raffaele Balsamo, Camine Di Palma, Francesco Cantiello, Giuseppina Azzarito, Vicenzo Mirone, Andrea Tubaro, Riccardo Autorino Journal of Urology.2012; 188(5): 1883. CrossRef
Male infertility after endoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal (Tep) hernia repair (Main): rationale and design of a prospective observational cohort study Nelleke Schouten, Thijs van Dalen, Niels Smakman, Sjoerd G Elias, Cees van de Water, Roan J Spermon, Laurens Sibinga Mulder, Ine P J Burgmans BMC Surgery.2012;[Epub] CrossRef
Perioperative effectiveness research using large databases Robert E. Freundlich, Sachin Kheterpal Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology.2011; 25(4): 489. CrossRef
PURPOSE To estimate the reporting rate of tuberculosis in one medium-sized city in Korea.
METHODS
Data claimed by national health insurance corporationand notification data of KTBS (Korea Tuberculosis Surveillance System) were compared through medical record-linkage method. Regarding the cases that were claimed medical care fee as tuberculosis but not notified to KTBS, we reviewed medical charts of the patients and investigated the reasons of failure to notify.
RESULTS
Number of cases claimed health insurance fee as tuberculosis occurrences in Cheonan was 2,331 in 2007, while 956 cases were matched as notified cases to KTBS after electronic record-linkage by personal identifier. Among remaining 1,375 cases that were not matched, real missed cases through medical record review survey were found to be 104. The reasons of failure to notify were because of 'not tuberculosis patients' (500, 36.4%), 'notified in 2006' (421, 30.6%), 'diseases coding error' (341, 24.8%) and 'notified as other diseases' (9, 0.7%). Therefore, the corrected reporting rate was calculated at 93% (95% CI: 91.6% - 94.2%). Notably, reporting rate of clinics (58.1%) was significantly lower than those of hospitals (93.4%) or general hospitals (96.6%).
CONCLUSIONS
All cases of tuberculosis diagnosis, which were claimed and not notified, were verified, the reporting rate was not as low as that of the data known through media.
However, to reach the goal of tuberculosis elimination (reporting rate over 95%), more effort into improvement of the reporting system is necessary.
communicable diseases. The purposes of the study is to estimate reporting proportion of National Notifiable Infectious Diseases(NNIDs) and investigate characteristics related to reporting using KAP(knowledge, attitude, practice) model.
METHOD
We surveyed randomly selected 2,185 physicians (speciality: internal medicine, family medicine, pediatrics, dermatology, general physicians) of their knowledge, attitude, and practice of NNIDs reporting through self-administered mail questionnaires. Of them, 231 physicians responded (response proportion: 10.6%).
RESULT
The reporting proportion was estimated to 27.0%.
Recognition level (knowledge) of NNIDs was relatively high with proportion of 69.4%, and attitude (public health importance) of reporting was 65.8%. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that knowledge, attitude significantly affected physicians' reporting in a positive direction (O.R. 6.2, 6.2 respectively). Whereas, senior age group, specialty (family medicine, pediatrics, dermatology) showed significantly lower reporting. General (tertiary care) hospital level of care showed significantly higher reporting practice (alpha=0.05).
CONCLUSION
The NNIDs reporting proportion, 27.0% is similar with those studied recently. Continuous efforts to increase the performance level of communicable diseases surveillance system. Of those, restructuring surveillance systems considering characteristics of notifiable diseases classes must be stressed. Educational approach of physicians needs to be tailored specially to newly-designated diseases such as Group II, Designated Group NNIDs.